Home / Computing / Laptop / Dell Inspiron 13z / PCMark Vantage: Full Results

Dell Inspiron 13z - PCMark Vantage: Full Results

Andy Vandervell

By Andy Vandervell



Our Score:


Overall Score


Scores In Detail

  • Performance 8
  • Value 8
  • Features 6
  • Design 6
  • Battery Life 7


June 7, 2010, 2:10 pm

Having enjoyed Atom powered Eees for a couple of years, last week I found myself walking out of Staples, (of all places), with a CULV lappy. Complete impulse buy but, apart from the stupid shiny screen, very pleased with it so far.

Plumped for an Acer 1420P convertible job. 11.6" screen, Intel SU2100 CULV chip and 2GB DDR3, in a 1.7kg convertible tablet form factor, all for under 450 notes. Touch-screen is resistive and a bit pants to be honest (especially since the surface is so soft that I'm worried about dust landing on it and scratching it) but the ability to use the machine in places where a laptop is inconvenient is nice to have at a minimal price premium (it's a lot cheaper than the Acer 1810TZ). I popped my 320GB 7200rmp drive into it and that has made it pretty quick. 1080P content plays fine (flash, H.264, whatever) so long as there are not too many other background processes. For regular office-type work (which is what I do most of the time) it is as fast as I am - documents open in the blink of an eye and big pdfs scroll perfectly smoothly in Acrobat, etc.

But the best thing of all - I was sitting on the train this morning, working on documents, with wifi off, and the battery meter said 10.5 hours remaining. 10.5 hours! That's, what, over half of my regular working day. Amazing. And not unrealistic either from my week's experience of the machine. The main attraction of my EEE 1000HE was the huge battery life too, but this takes it a step further.

I know everyone has different priorities, but I fail to see the logic in making a small, lightweight laptop, with an economical processor that is optimised for low power draw and portability, and then endowing it with a battery that belongs in a smartphone.

With stuff like the hard drive and the memory, customers can personalise a device to an extent, so manufacturers can get away with economising there, but Dell's idea of an extended battery is so ridiculously cumbersome that it completely ruins the laptop. How can this make sense? And why on earth did Dell send you such a stupid product?

Tony Walker

June 8, 2010, 2:58 am

@TR - the processor is an SU7300 - you missed the "U" out.

@Everyone else - a large swathe of CULV lappies are due with the ULV versions of the i3/i5/i7 finally due.

comments powered by Disqus