large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Huawei Mate 8 Review - Battery, speakers call quality and verdict Review


Huawei Mate 8 – Battery, speakers and call quality

Tucked inside that big metal body is a large 4,000 mAh battery, that’s a substantial number when you consider there isn’t a power draining quad-HD display at work here.

With general use the Huawei Mate 8 offers superior battery life than most competing phablets. A day of generally heavy use – multiple email accounts, messaging and the usual phone activity – left me with 49% come midnight, and thanks to Marshmallow’s Doze feature it only loses about 3-5% on average over night.

An hour long episode of Making a Murderer on Netflix will eat through about 8%, while streaming a whole Match of the Day on BBC iPlayer takes the battery from 81% to 70%. That’s a pretty impressive showing and certainly on-par with the great battery life I found on the Moto X Force.

Related: What is USB-C?
m8 17

Unlike the Nexus 6P, Huawei has decided against replacing the more common microUSB with the snazzier and reversible USB-C port. For now that’s fine, but USB-C will be seen on a load of phones this year and it could leave the Mate 8 trailing behind.

Predictably there’s no wireless Qi support, but fast-charging is supported and you can jump from a dead battery to 50% full in about 40 minutes. a full charge takes between 80-90 minutes.

I’m less impressed by the lack of front-facing speakers, with the meagre bottom firing versions pumping out dull sounding, pretty flat audio. I guess though that the addition of front speakers would have made this a ridiculously tall phone.

One particularly neat trick is the voice recorder app, which captures audio from the array of mics positioned around the phone. Call quality is great too, especially from the speakerphone.
m8 9

Should I buy the Huawei Mate 8?

The Mate 8 is a nice looking phone with great battery life and strong performance. But, it’s seriously let down by awful software and an
inconsistent camera. Personally, if you’ve got £430 to spend and you want a large screened Android phone I wouldn’t go for the Mate 8.

Nexus 6P pricing starts at £449 and it is a much, much better phone. If you search about online you can find the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 for a similar price. There’s also the Moto X Style (£329) which is another great pick.

Huawei helped make the best phone of 2015, but it’s got a lot of work to do if it wants to do a similar thing in 2016.


Good battery and a sleek design aren’t enough to recommend this over the far superior competition

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 9
  • Camera 6
  • Design 8
  • Battery Life 8
  • Usability 5
  • Value 6
  • Features 7
  • Software 4
  • Calls & Sound 9
  • Screen Quality 7

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.