Home / Mobile / Fitness / Fitbit Force / Pictures

Fitbit Force pictures

1 of 6 pictures

Fitbit Force
Fitbit Force

6 Pictures - Fitbit Force

  • Fitbit Force
  • Fitbit Force
  • Fitbit Force
  • Fitbit Force
  • Fitbit Force
  • Fitbit Force

Prem Desai

January 14, 2014, 8:41 am

Fitbit have missed a trick here. They should have incorporated a watch. I'd be in the market for that. Don't want to wear a watch and this too.

Jessie Pavelka

January 14, 2014, 9:30 am

The Force does have a watch...

Prem Desai

January 15, 2014, 9:03 am

Sorry - I meant a 'proper' watch - one that is always displayed and you don't have to press anything and that isn't too tiny.

Sony have managed to do this with their SW2 where the time is always displayed with minimal battery use - shame it sucks at everything else!!

Still waiting for the perfect device ....!!!!

Ryan

January 16, 2014, 10:11 am

Sounds like "First World Problems" to me.

katana

January 19, 2014, 1:31 am

Why not just get a watch!

KJ

January 19, 2014, 1:40 am

Checkout the "Jaybird Reign" coming out this summer...
and get yourself a watch...

Prem Desai

January 19, 2014, 10:11 am

You are kidding me right? Because the fitbit itself is a life saving necessity??

Ryan

January 19, 2014, 3:10 pm

In the age of cell phones, tablets, etc. You want another thing that displays time? I've got a suggestion for a "proper watch", it's called a watch. It's a fitness tracker, that happens to tell the time. It's advertised as a fitness tracker, not a watch.

Prem Desai

January 19, 2014, 5:59 pm

Not sure what you're getting so upset about.

I'm merely saying that if this is to be worn on the wrist, I'd like it to tell the time too. I do not wish to wear a watch and this. I do not wish to have to press a button to tell the time.

You may walk around with your phone and tablet strapped to your wrist to tell the time. I still use my watch to tell the time.

Ryan

January 19, 2014, 7:07 pm

Upset? How can you tell exactly how I'm feeling? What I'm saying is that your pointing out that you would have a constant display to tell the time, rather than pushing a button. That would be considered a "First World Problem". I'm not upset, could not care less, it's funny.

KJ

January 19, 2014, 11:41 pm

For rest whose actually interested in a fitness tracker.. checkout the "Jaybird Reign" due to be released this summer. I was going to get the bitfit but Jaybird seems to be what Fitbit should be.. I dont want to spend $100+ and then another couple hundred in six months so I'm going to wait!

Ryan

January 21, 2014, 11:37 am

$199 price point my turn some people off, I haven't seen much info on the mobile app and desktop interface. That for the most part will be the deciding point. It does look very futuristic, I must say.

macmaven

February 7, 2014, 6:16 pm

Not waterproof? What was Fitbit thinking? Surely they understand that many swim to stay fit and would like to track that activity. What a failed omission for their flagship product.

comments powered by Disqus