Home / Opinions / Quantum Dots Explained: What they are and why they’re awesome

Quantum Dots Explained: What are quantum dots and why are they so awesome?

Andy Vandervell


Quantum Dots Explained

Everything you need to know about... Quantum Dots

Quantum dots. Sound cool, don't they? But for once this is a technology that's actually as good as it sounds. Quantum dots, among other things, have the potential to revitalise the LCD screens in our phones, tablets, TVs and laptops.

It was widely tipped that Apple would use quantum dots in the iPhone 6 way back in 2014. It didn't turn out that way in the end, of course, but we have seen the technology cropping up in the Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 7 and HDX 8.9 tablets.

But the most notable use of this technology to date has been in TV sets. LG, Sony, and Samsung have all released quantum dot TVs in recent years, with the latter completely diverting its attention and resources away from OLED TV development in favour of quantum dot LCDs.

Indeed, at CES 2016, Samsung has revealed an exciting new flagship range of SUHD TV sets, all of which contain quantum dot displays.

And it's important because quantum dots is one of the technologies that's driving the creation of high dynamic range TVs (HDR) and the creation of the new Ultra HD Premium standard.

Without quantum dots, TVs likely wouldn't be bright enough to do HDR, but what is it about them that makes them so essential. Read on to find out.

What are quantum dots?

Simplifying things greatly (as this guide aims to do, mostly), quantum dots are incredibly small particles. They range between 2 to 10 nanometers in diameter, which is equivalent to 50 atoms. Yes, atoms. You can't measure these things using your old school shatter proof ruler. It's this small size that gives quantum dots the unique properties to improve our tech.

The colour light that a quantum dot emits is directly related to its size; smaller dots appear blue, larger ones more red. In LCD screens they're applied as a way of eliminating the need for White LED backlights and colour filters.

As Dr. Raymond M. Soneira, President of DisplayMate, explains: "Instead of using existing White LEDs (which have yellow phosphors) that produce a broad light spectrum that makes it hard to efficiently produce saturated colors, Quantum Dots directly convert the light from Blue LEDs into highly saturated narrow band primary colors for LCDs."

What are the benefits of quantum dots?

For LCD screens, the benefits are numerous. They're the kind of benefits that are simply no-brainers.

Higher peak brightness – One of the reasons TV manufacturers like quantum dots is that they allow them to produce TVs with much higher peak brightness. This opens up some interesting possibilities, such as enabling support for 'high dynamic range' TVs that support standards such as Dolby Vision.

In simple terms, Dolby Vision is a film standard that, when used, results in content that retains more colour and contrast information than existing standards. The result is pictures that have greater differences in the brightest and darkest parts of the image and look more 'dynamic' and real as a result.

Imagine shots where looking into the sun actually feels like looking in to the sun for real and you get an idea. To do this you need brighter TVs and quantum dots deliver exactly that.

Following the acceptance of 4K resolutions, HDR in general is the next big feature of TVs, and all of the top TV sets announced at CES 2016 this year have made bold claims about their 'high dynamic range' capabilities. Quantum Dot technology, like OLED, goes hand in hand with this advance.

Related: Should your next TV have Dolby Vision?

Better colour accuracy – Another big benefit of quantum dots is improved colour accuracy. The light produced by quantum dots is so closely tied to their size that they can be tuned very precisely to emit the exact kind of light needed. This means purer, cleaner whites and more precise colours.

Amazon Kindle HDXColours on the Kindle HDX series are excellent

Higher colour saturation – One advantage, though some might call it a disadvantage in some contexts, of OLED screens over LCDs is colour saturation. Colours on OLED screens simply 'pop' more due to the huge colour gamut OLED screens can achieve. Quantum dots can, according to Dr. Soneira, increase the colour gamut on LCD screens by in the region of 40 to 50 per cent.

This is great, but it's the combination of high colour gamut and great accuracy that's really exciting. OLED screens look fantastic to the untrained eye, but many of those found in phones aren't very accurate or 'faithful' to the actual colours they're presenting. This can create imbalances, such as radioactive colours and iffy skin tones in videos and photos.

Taking a long term view, the impact of more devices with larger colour gamuts could mean a serious increase in the quality of video and other content. Specifically, in the level of detail you can see due to greater number of colours available.

This improvement in colour production is what's driving the move towards HDR, which means adopting new standards for colour that cover more of the colours we can see in the real world. Current standards, like sRGB and Rec.709, only cover 80% of the colour available in the P3 colour space used by HDR TVs and content mastered for HDR.

None of this would be possible, on an LCD TV at least, without quantum dots.

Related: HDR TV: What is it and should you care?

Improved battery life in mobile gadgets – One of the contradictions of modern tech is that people say they want better battery life, but when it comes to it they'll choose a slimmer, sleeker and 'sexier' phone over a chunky one with better battery life. Some of you reading this will be jumping up and down saying that's not you, but it is most people. Phones haven't been getting slimmer and lighter by accident. Companies make them that way because that's what sells.

Another truism is that the most effective way, by far, to improve your phone, tablet or laptop's battery life is to simply turn the brightness down. You can fiddle with the settings as much as you like, but it's the screen that sucks down the most power. Which is why the potential power savings of quantum dots, believed to be up to 20 per cent, are so attractive.

What quantum dots promise, on paper, is superior image quality and a reduction in power use. That's a powerful combination, especially for a company like Apple that's loathed to compromise on design for the sake of practical things like larger batteries.

(This is also yet another reminder that the slow pace of battery tech development is holding back our tech. Since it hasn't improved markedly, companies are forced to find power savings elsewhere.)

What are the downsides of quantum dots?

While there are doubtless plenty of complexities in integrating quantum dots into screens, from an end user perspective the only downside we've seen thus far is (an actually quite serious) light bleed issue. This was seen on the aforementioned Kindle HDX tablets, which were the first quantum dot tablets.

While not visible under many conditions, any white background (i.e. when reading a book) exposed very irritating bleed from the edges. Rather than white light, the bleed on the Amazon Fires was blue. Why? Because the backlight LEDs are blue.

Kindle BacklightHere you can see the backlight issue on the Kindle Fire HDX is severe

This isn't a trivial problem. When we reviewed both these Amazon tablets back in 2014, we were impressed by the colours, contrast and brightness, but the light bleed was profoundly annoying – enough so that it devalued the good parts. Solving this issue is vital to whether we see quantum dot phones and tablets, but we'd put our money on it getting sorted fairly soon. Apple reportedly has patents describing how it plans to solve this particular problem.

Since then, however, it's clear TV manufacturers have this paritcular problem under control, so we're not too concerned about this issue anymore.

Should you be excited about quantum dot technology?

Definitely, yes. In fact, we'd argue that quantum dots are a more interesting development than 4K TVs in some respects. While a sharper picture is great, dynamic contrast – the difference between the brightest and darkest part of picture – has a huge impact on the viewing experience. Quantum dots give LCD TVs the colour depth and contrast to move our viewing experience forward. So next time you buy an LCD TV, you'll want one with quantum dots in it.


February 28, 2014, 11:50 pm

Weren't self illuminating OLED screens hailed as battery savers - so what makes the quantom dot technology any different?

David van der Zande

March 1, 2014, 5:22 pm

Ehm. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the backlight in the Xperia Z2 is also blue and has triluminos, some kind of quantom dots right?


March 1, 2014, 9:51 pm

And what happened to the IGZO screen. The claim was that they saved power also. Is any smartphone using that currently. I am pretty sure the rumours were that the iPhone 5 was going to use those.


March 3, 2014, 9:26 am

For the most part it's simply another way to do the same thing...

The main downside with OLED is that blue in particular has a relatively short shelf life (it readily oxidises) meaning they need to do funky things with pixel sizes (see Pentile) to get around that. Mostly by making the blue pixels larger so they can be run at lower voltages for the same luminance. They also need to be made and laminated in a low oxygen environment which can be expensive...

Then there's pixel burn-out (often called burn-in but it's actually the other way round) which is related to the last one but an active effect rather than passive. Most people with OLED screens (myself included) have become familiar with the clock and system tray at the top right becoming persistent - Quantum Dots may not do that depending on how stable they are compared to OLED.

Also, there's theoretically nothing stopping manufacturers from using blue OLEDs with Quantum Dots to get the best of both worlds! (Battery saving and colour accuracy)


July 21, 2014, 3:27 pm

sRGB and Rec. 709 use the exact same primaries, hence they provide identical color spaces.


December 16, 2014, 4:14 pm

who cares how bright the colours are if you can't do black?


December 16, 2014, 7:30 pm

Quantum Dots... oh boy!

Celso Ishikawa

December 17, 2014, 1:17 pm

No... it's bluish screen is caused by default cold white-balance from
factory. You can change it any time in Android screen config.


December 19, 2014, 7:54 am

i might have taen this article seriously except for the point it started discussing screens in terms of LCD.

LCD (Liquid Crsyal Display)for those who are not aware are the type generally found in cheap calculators. TVs use LED's (Light Emitting Diode).

This is one of my pet peeves along with muddling Mb (megabit) and MB (megabyte) and the likes.

Kevin Hoadley

December 19, 2014, 10:33 am

No, no and NO.

"LED" televisions use an LCD panel in front of an LED backlight. The same is true of almost all laptop, tablet and mobile phone displays. Despite the LED name, they're all LCD, using the LCD panel to control the actual pixel illumination.

If you want a genuine LED display - ie one where the pixel are emissive, rather than merely transmissive of a underlying backlight - then you need to pay up for an OLED display.


December 19, 2014, 1:05 pm

I have the Panasonic Z65 and nothing compares with it (-: I just hope the will start producing plasma screens again before it breaks.


December 23, 2014, 12:11 pm

phone companies are making smartphones thinner because people like it but also because batteries cost, so smaller battery and cheaper phones=higher gains. Then also the battery life of smaller batteries is shorter so to push people to buy a new phone cause the old one last for a really short time


January 6, 2015, 12:24 pm

@Guest No you can't be much more wrong. LCD describes the panel technology, LED describe the backlight technology. LED is actually misnomer for LED LCD. In the very old days indeed calculator type monocrhome displays are indeed called Liquid crystal displays (LCD). These monocrhome display does not require backlight illumination and instead rely on a reflective back surface. Then, we have computer monitors made with colour LCD, these require backlight using CCFL fluorescent tubes. Since there were no confusion we simply continued to call them LCD, instead of CCFL backlit colour LCD. Then, manufacturers replaced CCFL backlight by LED, mainly due to size saving, which enabled ultra thin displays. To distinguish this from traditional CCFL LCD display, they called it LED display. Which, as I mentioned before, is a misnomer, as the display panel is still LCD.


January 8, 2015, 8:11 am

there are LEDonly-displays but not used as living room tv cause they are too bright. the photo realistic ones i saw, were huge displays at the bigger commercial festivals behind the dj and few times as advertisement boards. Most of the LEDonly-displays are basic one color displays used as road signs. correct me if i'm wrong. have a nice weekend :)


January 8, 2015, 4:28 pm

Sharp's own offering of tablet and smart phone (e.g. Sharp SH-06E, AQUOS Xx 304SH) uses IGZO. Some laptops also use that. Apple is holding off IGZO for iphones, and only plans to use it on iPad Air 3. I think Sharp has not fully commercialised the smart phone IGZO panels yet.


January 16, 2015, 1:12 pm

Plasma is dead and gone.

My Sony 4K w. QD is leaps and bounds better than your old plasma screen.


February 24, 2015, 1:37 am

QD is still LCD which means it still suffers from the issues all LCDs suffer from like black levels, contrast, motion, viewing angles and screen uniformity. I won't be getting another LCD screen regardless of what backlight technology is used.


February 24, 2015, 1:42 am

Why are they so obsessed with brightness? How many people have TVs in their homes with the brightness set anywhere near the maximum output. On my 6 year old LCD I have the backlight set to 6/10 the brightness set to like 65/100 and it is more than bright enough even in a well lit room.


June 27, 2015, 4:25 pm

"With the exception of things like Dolby Vision, you're more likely the enjoy the benefits without content specifically enhanced to take advantage." --> Is there a type here or something, I can't get the gist of this. Are you saying we won't enjoy the benefits of Quantum Dot Displays because there's no content specifically enhanced to take advantage of Quantum Dot Displays?

Dave McArthur

February 25, 2016, 10:41 am

"Without quantum dots, TVs likely wouldn't
be bright enough to do HDR, but what is it about them that makes them so
essential." Absolute rubbish. Panasonic have released a 1000 nit HDR model which AV forums have said is the best LED TV they have seen to date. There are no quantum dots in that TV so why are they so important ? Simple answer, they aren't.

Bene Pendentes

May 11, 2016, 7:17 pm

Indeed. With 120" screen, even the white background SKY logo forces us to look away.


July 14, 2016, 10:58 pm

They are important because it allows them to achieve the same goal but in a cheaper way.


August 29, 2016, 7:52 pm

Simple answer is you're wrong. Quantum dots make HDR possible.


August 29, 2016, 7:54 pm

OLED and quantum dots eliminate the back light. HDR fixes the prolbems you describe.


August 29, 2016, 7:57 pm

Clearly you don't understand. LCD is the Liquid Crystal Display. the provide the color The white LED's are behind those to provide the backlight. LED's use very little power and quantum dots even less.

comments powered by Disqus