Home / Cameras / Camera / Kodak EasyShare Z915 / Test Shots - Detail and Lens Performance

Kodak EasyShare Z915 - Test Shots - Detail and Lens Performance

By Cliff Smith

Reviewed:

Summary

Our Score:

8

User Score:

A range of general test shots are shown over the next two pages. In some cases, the full size image has been reduced for bandwidth purposes, and a crop taken from the original full resolution image has been placed below it to show the overall image quality. Some other pictures may be clicked to view the original full-size image.

----

Here's the usual detail test shot of the West Window of Exeter Cathedral, for you to compare with other cameras. See below for a full res crop, or click to see the whole picture.

----

----

----

----

----

Noodles

July 17, 2009, 6:26 pm

Umm.. The 10X zoom Canon SX110 IS can be had for £175, and as much as I'd like Kodak to be a big name player again, it completely beats it into submission.. Kodak also needs to hire a new designer, the camera is freakishly ugly. It might not have mattered five years ago, but we all know how consumers really do care about how their gadgets look now..

joose

July 18, 2009, 4:40 am

I'm quite impressed with the iso tests with this camera, it looks really good at 1600. Also, the shadow detail in the dynamic range was good. Looks are important, but I quite like the design of this which just goes to prove that beauty is in the eye of the beholder ;) If they could make the same design but in metal and lower the compression of the images, I'd be interested.

Bertie

November 15, 2009, 10:42 pm

Noodles...the Z915 is available for LESS than £120 now which is substantially lower than the review price. This MUST make a value difference but for me the focussing delay is the downer. I can live with the claimed image deficiencies which certainly do not show (for me anyway) in the samples shown. The high ISO result is particularly impressive. Shame.....this could have been one of the cameras to help Kodak back on their feet.

comments powered by Disqus