Home / Opinions / Nintendo Switch vs Xbox One and PS4 – How do they compare?

Nintendo Switch vs Xbox One and PS4


ps4 vs switch vs xbox

Nintendo Switch vs PS4 and Xbox One: How does Nintendo's console stack up to its rivals? We compare all the specs, controllers, hardware, features and games.

The Nintendo Switch is unlike any other console on the market. Taking HD gaming and putting it in your pocket, there are some serious technical achievements. But how does it compare to its competitors, and what can you expect in terms of performance? Here, we look at the Switch alongside the PS4 and Xbox One.

Before we get started, it’s worth pointing out that this article is not intended to help decide which is better, but instead explain how the Switch differs.

Related: Upcoming Nintendo Switch Games 2017

How the Nintendo Switch works

To make sure we’re all on the same page, it’s worth taking a moment to explain how the Switch works. You can read more details in our Switch review, but here’s its main functionality in a few bullet points:

  • Main console is a 6.2-inch 1,280 x 720-pixel touchscreen unit, controlled by two detachable Joy-Con controllers that dock to either side
  • Between 2.5 and 6 hours of battery life when gaming
  • Console can be docked, outputting games to your TV. Joy-Cons instead connect to Joy-Con Grip for wireless play
  • Joy-Cons can also be used separately by two players for simpler games or games that use multiplayer motion controls
  • More traditional “Pro” controller sold separately
  • Up to eight consoles can connect wirelessly for local multiplayer

Now we’re up to speed, let’s head to the comparisons.

Nintendo Switch 10

Nintendo Switch vs PS4 and Xbox One – Controllers

Nintendo has made the controllers on the Switch unlike anything we’ve seen before. Let’s take a look at how a pair of Joy-Con controllers and the Pro controller compare to Sony and Microsoft’s offerings.

Feature Joy-Con pair Switch Pro Xbox One PS4 PS4 Move pair
Control buttons 18 touchscreen

18 17 17 touch 18
Analogue sticks 2 2 2 2 2
Vibration Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Wireless Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Battery capacity 525mAh (each) 1300mAh N/A 1000mAh 1520mAh (each)
Battery life 20h (official) 40h (official) Variable ~7 h ~10h
Motion controls Yes Yes No Yes Yes
IR camera Yes No No No No
Removable batteries*** No No Yes No No
Play and charge Yes* Yes Yes** Yes Yes
Headphone jack No No Yes Yes No

* With optional Charge Grip

** Play-and-charge kit available

*** Without voiding warranty

A table can’t explain all the differences between the controllers. For example, the rumble feedback in the Joy-Con controllers is described as “HD”, with extremely precise motors that let you feel very subtle movements. This will come in handy in motion-controlled games and the rumoured VR headset.Nintendo Switch 2

The way the Joy-Cons charge is much more confusing than simply connecting over USB. Connected to the screen, the controllers are powered so don’t need to use their own battery. To charge them properly, you’ll need to dock the console and attach the controllers to it. That way, the console and controllers all charge at the same time.

Considering the Joy-Con can go 20+ hours between charges, this shouldn’t be a big problem. If you think it will be, you can pick up a Charge Grip for £24.99. You’ll be able to trail a cable from your console (or a wall plug) and charge the Joy-Con while still playing.

Related: Best Nintendo Switch Games

Nintendo Switch 3

It’s important not to forget PlayStation Move controllers here, which is why we’ve included them in the comparison table. The Move is technically quite different; it needs to be within view of a sensor in order to deliver spatially accurate motion controls. The Switch doesn’t work like this, and therefore doesn’t have the same spatially accurate movements.

The right-side Joy-Con also includes an infrared sensor for detecting objects and motion, and also includes and NFC chip for detecting Amiibo characters.

Nintendo Switch vs PS4 and Xbox One – Specs and Graphics

Here’s the bit the techies were waiting for. Let’s run down the raw specifications of the three consoles.

Feature Switch* Xbox One** PS4**
CPU: Cores 4x ARM Cortex A57 8x AMD Jaguar 8x AMD Jaguar
CPU: Clock speed 1020MHz 1,750MHz 1,600MHz
GPU: Cores 256 Nvidia CUDA 768x AMD Shaders 1152 AMD shaders
GPU: Docked speed 768MHz 853MHz 800MHz
GPU: Undocked speed 307.2MHz N/A N/A
HDR No? Yes (One S) Yes
Memory 4GB 8GB 8GB
Storage 32GB flash (microSD-expandable) 500GB HDD 500GB HDD
Physical game formats Game Card Disc Disc
USB ports 2x USB2, 1x USB3.0 3x USB 3.0 2x USB 3.1 (gen1)
Video output HDMI HDMI HDMI (HDR supported)
Audio ports None Optical Optical
Networking ports None Gigabit Ethernet Gigabit Ethernet
Power consumption Unknown ~125W ~140W

* CPU and GPU specs are non-official, based on reports including those from Digital Foundry

** For simplicity, these are Original PS4 and Xbox One rather than updated PS4 Pro/Slim and Xbox One S

Let’s look at the top five rows first. It’s not surprising to see that the Switch has a considerably lower processor speed, fewer processor cores, fewer GPU shaders and a lower GPU clock speed. This is a tiny machine, after all.

Related: Nintendo Switch battery life – is it enough?

Nintendo Switch 1

To the uninitiated, these numbers will be confusing and make the Switch look like a piddly little machine. Rest assured that the Nvidia tech that powers this is genuinely remarkable. Consider this: the CPU and GPU in the Switch, which is based on the Nvidia Tegra X1 found in the Nvidia Shield console, will likely have a maximum power consumption of 15W (not taking the screen or other components into account). Compare that to the original PS4 and Xbox One and you’re looking at multiple times more.

Is it not a bit fruitless to compare a portable console to the giant slabs that sit under our TVs? Not completely. After all, the the Switch is as much a home console as it is a portable one, and if it can’t do justice to your big, expensive TV then you might feel short-changed.

The Switch will output at a maximum of Full HD (1080p), so if you have a 4K television, it’ll need to do some work to upscale the footage. This compares to both the Xbox One and PS4, which also output at a native Full HD resolution. However, what resolution the Switch is actually drawing is unclear. We don’t know if some games will be drawn in something like 900p, then upscaled to Full HD before being sent to your TV, which will look worse than proper Full HD.

It doesn’t look like the console will support HDR either, which is something all PS4s support (with a software update), as does the new Xbox One S.

Related: Mario Kart 8 Deluxe preview

Nintendo Switch

When undocked, the Switch has a 720p screen. This resolution consists of 921,600 pixels, where Full HD is 2,073,600 pixels. If you spotted that the Switch has a much slower GPU clock speed when undocked, this is the reason why. There’s a lot less work to do at 720p, so this will save on battery life.

It looks like different games will have different performance specs depending on whether they’re docked or not. For example, Zelda: Breath of the Wild is aiming for 1080p performance at 60fps. Right now, it’s at just 900p/30fps when docked, which isn’t brilliant. Expect news stories about every single Switch game launch relating to docked/undocked performance discrepancies. Oh, the joy.

Storage is another concern. With just 32GB of on-board storage compared to the up to 2TB you can get on Sony and Microsoft’s consoles, there’s not much room for media or game downloads. Nintendo’s online subscription service will include free game downloads every month, so you’ll need to keep an eye on your console to make sure you have enough room for the games.

See also: Nintendo Switch Problems and How to Solve Them

You can expand the Switch’s storage with a microSD card, and you'll be able to install games onto it.

You’ll probably buy most of your games physically. These will come on Nintendo Game Cards, a format with a capacity of around 16GB. This is significantly smaller than the massive 50GB games you can get on the bigger consoles, but since these games will be much more stylised (less detailed) than those, it’s no surprise.

In terms of audio, there’s no high-quality optical S/PDIF port on the Switch. This isn’t an enormous problem, but is worth bearing in mind if you're setting up the Switch as part of a high-end home cinema system.

Nintendo Switch vs PS4 and Xbox One – Exclusive Titles

After all the technical discussion above, ultimately whether you buy a Switch will be down to the games you want to play. Nintendo exclusives remain strong, including Zelda and Mario titles as well as Splatoon and dozens more besides.

Similarly, there are phenomenal exclusives on Xbox One and PS4 that might take your fancy.

Related: ARMS preview

Nintendo Switch vs PS4 and Xbox One – Final Thoughts

The Nintendo Switch is a technically fascinating console with loads of features that might take time to fulfil their potential. At £280, it will be a harder sell than the known entities of the PS4 and Xbox One, but those machines can’t do gaming on the move – a huge, huge deal for many people.

Ultimately, the Switch isn't really designed as a straight-up rival to the PlayStation and Xbox, if only because you probably already own one of those systems. To our mind, the most compelling argument for the Switch is as a complementary console, one which adds unique functionality and a handful of tempting exclusives – namely The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild – to your gaming arsenal.

For hardcore gamers, die-hard Nintendo fans, and those with long commutes, buying the Switch may be something of a no-brainer. But for the rest of us, nigh on £300 is a steep asking price for something that, in all likelihood, will live its life as a secondary system.

WATCH: Best Nintendo Switch games

How do you think the Nintendo Switch compares to the PS4 and Xbox One? Let us know in the comments below.


January 16, 2017, 7:32 pm

Sooooo why wasn't there an exclusive comparison chart too?


January 16, 2017, 10:51 pm

well it all come to software but i think 3rd parties going to abandon the "switch" and probably force nintendo to make a new acutal home console that might match the next playstation and xbox (not ps4 pro or xbox scorpio) and make the "switch" a hand held device.

Kevin Brenner-Bourget

January 17, 2017, 9:37 am

You have some pretty bismal unaccurate information here.

Nintendo has officially confirmed that its new Switch console-handheld hybrid will support the SDXC specifcation's maximum capacity, meaning memory cards up to 2TB in size will be compatible with the Switch. WAY HIGHER than a capped PS4 disk of 50gb.

Your chart says there's no headphone jack on the switch. Seriously, its next to the game card input. You even have it diagrammed in a picture. This article is trash.


January 17, 2017, 10:17 am

Can wireless/bluetooth headphones be paired with the Switch while on the move? If not, what's the point of creating a truly portable console if you have to be tethered to the thing with a wire

Michael Passingham

January 17, 2017, 11:05 am

Hi Kevin, when I was talking about the controllers not having a headphone jack, I meant the Joy-Cons alone. The console itself does have a headphone jack, but my comparisons were about the controller alone. Like if you're playing it in your living room on the couch, you'll still have to trail an audio cable from your TV. I hope this clears things up.

As for storage, this is true and I put the SD expandability into both the table and mentioned it in the article. Sure, you can go well beyond the 500GB of the PS4 etc, but SDXC cards at that capacity are extremely expensive. You'd be adding at least £70 to the cost for a 200GB card. I can't even find 500GB MicroSD cards online, but regular SD cards of that capacity are over £300.


January 17, 2017, 2:41 pm

If you've never seen anything like a Switch before I guess you've never seen an Nvidia Shield. But the Shield doesn't handicap itself when it's unplugged, and it also has AAA games. The Switch is too little too late, Nintendo chose to remove itself from the console wars a decade ago, and this toe dip of a console is going to get the whole foot bitten off by the sharks in the console water.


January 17, 2017, 2:49 pm

you'll have an easier time finding and affording unicorn piss before a 2TB sd card. your biased fanboy is showing.


January 17, 2017, 4:00 pm

This is probably Sega's last console... uhh I mean Nintendo's. How'd could I get the two confused? I really... Really like Nintendo over Sony or MS but this is underwhelming at best. I do like the local LAN capabilities. That part they should really capitalize on. Call em... Switch Parties! They could even say it is an attempt to reunite humanity since 90% of the world prefers electronic interactions vs real human contact. LOL!

Dario Montoya

January 17, 2017, 11:56 pm

nvidia shield is $179 why is nintendo pushing a higher price tag if its similar


January 18, 2017, 3:44 am

you can also throw a 2 tb hdd in a ps4 and costs a lot less


January 18, 2017, 5:36 pm

Not to mention the costs of those cards. As of this writing, a 128gb card is still almost $60-70+ USD with NO data on it. I expect the Switch will stay in the 32gb range to keep game card costs low enough for consumers to buy.


January 18, 2017, 9:49 pm

128gb samsung evo + is 27 bucks on ebay. an 128gb samsung evo is 25. you dont need to overpay at bestbuy or target.


January 18, 2017, 9:51 pm

zelda is only 13gb, so you dont really need a 500gb like ps4 because the games are not 60gb. also you dont need to install games before playing like xbox/ps4. therefore a 128gb samsung evo + from ebay at $27 is more than plenty even if you are going fully digital.


January 19, 2017, 9:55 am

marketing, exclusivity, brand loyality
that sort of gimmicks


January 19, 2017, 9:58 am

still after a decade nintendo is still struggling to get 1080P native resolution on their consoles
though i can somewhat understand the battery issue, though 3H for 720P 30FPS gameplay is pretty crap.


January 19, 2017, 10:59 am

Unlikely. Nintendo has something like $10.5 billion USD equivalent in cash reserves.
The losses they've been having in the last 4 years?
They can keep going like that until about 2050 with no improvement, no problem whatsoever.

It'll take a lot more than the switch failing to kill nintendo.
Sega was in a worse position than this at the PEAK of their popularity (mega drive/ Genesis days)
They were nearly bankrupt when the dreamcast happened, and in fact their financial problems went a long way to killing the dreamcast before it's time...


January 24, 2017, 12:38 am

Doesn't the shield have pretty poor game support?


January 24, 2017, 8:20 am

it does. but it's mostly because it doesn't play full AAA titles


January 25, 2017, 2:30 am

that might be their long term strat, if the switch fails phase out 3ds and turn switch into primary portable, then make a home console in which the switch might be able to dock so that it still has a place in the home


January 25, 2017, 3:36 pm

that what i'm thinking about it. the "switch" becoming a hand-held, while a new one could be a home console up against a next gen console like the ps5 and xbox (next gen) but only for at least 5 to 6 years.


January 25, 2017, 4:57 pm

Yeah the more I think about it the more it makes sense, the switch can easily and perfectly transition into a pure handheld console as time goes on and newer hardware becomes available, and may even be able to stream games like the ps vita does


January 26, 2017, 4:29 pm

i do wish nintendo make a remote play app for "switch". for ios, android and the pc and a "switch" official adapter for pc and you can connect to mobile via the micro-usb OTG adapter or make it bluetooth.


January 27, 2017, 5:58 pm

What do you mean by this, like the switch streams pc games like the Nvidia Shield? This would be amazing and would boost its sales, but 1. Nintendo would never make this cuz Nintendo. 2. Most of the people buying Nintendo consoles probably don't have gaming pcs


January 28, 2017, 3:57 pm

no, but it would be nice if nintendo lets nvidia put the shield hub app. for it, but what i'm say is the opposite, a decent pc that stream the "switch" to it, sony and microsoft did it, sony has a official ps4 adapter to play on ps4 remote app. and the ps now app., microsoft did with windows 10, i'm still surprise that none of the 3 major gaming home console can't stream the pc remotely. boost up the "switch" sales, it probably would. oh and windows/android/ios device could stream to it, just need a internet connection and your gaming account like PSN and Xbox Live and a Nintendo account (for their version of the remote play app).

1. yea, i doubt that too, to risky, because you could play games on the computer with a geforce gtx 700 series and up and also pirated games too, but it would benefit both nintendo and nvidia, it'll be strictly on geforce gtx 700 series and up gpus only, because nintendo uses a modified tegra x1 on the "switch" base off from the nvidia shield android tv one.

2. probably not, you don't need a very high end pc to stream remotely off the system if you have online connection, a decent android device works too (i try the unofficial ps4 remote play app. on my samsung galaxy s4 and it play smoothly with my mayflash wii u pro controller adapter on xinput (xbox 360/one controller input).


February 3, 2017, 12:43 am

i love how you use rumors in your charts as if they are facts

comments powered by Disqus