- Super-fast AF performance
- Good image quality
- Tiltable LCD monitor
- No hand-grip
- No pop-up flash
- Limited macro capabilites
- Review Price: £549.99
- 12.3-megapixel LiveMOS sensor
- ISO 200-12,800
- TruePic VI image processor
- Super-fast 35-point AF system
- Full HD movie recording
The first thing that strikes us about the E-PL3, is that the differences between it and its predecessor, the barely six-month-old E-PL2, are far more substantial than the differences between the E-PL2 and E-PL1 models. In other words, whereas the E-PL2 only really offered incremental upgrades over the E-PL1, the differences between the E-PL3 and E-PL2 are much more striking.
For a start the latest model comes with an LCD screen that can be tilted up or down for angled shooting, whereas the E-P2’s monitor was fixed in position. On the downside though, the E-PL3 also lacks the internal pop-up flash and finger grip of the E-PL2. What it does get, however, is the same sensor and image processor combination of the more expensive E-P3, meaning it’s capable of the same high image quality we saw on that model. Whichever way you look at it the E-PL3 sounds like an interesting proposition, but how does it shape up against its main rivals?
With a current street price of around £500-550 with a 14-42mm f/3.5-5.6 Zuiko kit zoom the E-PL3’s competitors within the Micro Four Thirds standard include its predecessor, the highly-rated E-PL2 (c.£430 with a 14-42mm zoom), and the classy little Panasonic Lumix GF3 (c.£380 with a 14-42mm zoom) which comes with an intuitive touch-screen control and built-in flash. It’s even possible to find the original E-PL1 and 14-42mm package in stock online for around £280 – a tempting price in its own right.
Although it uses a smaller CX format sensor, the recently announced Nikon V1 (£550 with a 10-30mm kit zoom) could also give the E-PL3 some competition on account of its super-fast Expeed 3 processor that enables it to deliver up to 60fps at full resolution, along with its innovative Motion Snapshot abilities. With its even smaller (1/2.3in) compact-sized sensor the tiny little Pentax Q is less of a competitor and actually more expensive than the E-PL3 at around £600 with a 8.5mm pancake lens.
Looking at compact system camera (CSC) rivals with larger APS-C sensors, the standout competitor has to be the Samsung NX100. In anticipation of the launch of the all-new Samsung NX200, the nearly 12-month-old NX100 is now being heavily discounted, with prices of around £300 with a 20-50mm kit lens available advertised online. The highly-rated Sony NEX-C3 (c.£430), on the other hand, is another CSC that uses an APS-C sensor. Interestingly, it matches the E-PL3 almost spec for spec elsewhere with its adjustable LCD monitor and lack of built-in flash.
Whichever way you look at it, that’s some pretty stiff competition. So how does the E-PL3 measure up. Let’s take a closer look and find out…
Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.