Home / Opinions / Samsung Galaxy Gear vs Sony SmartWatch 2 - Which is better?

Samsung Galaxy Gear vs Sony SmartWatch 2

Andrew Williams


Gear vs SmartWatch 2
Gear vs SmartWatch 2

Two tech heavyweights have just launched high-profile smartwatches, the Samsung Galaxy Gear and the Sony SmartWatch 2. But which is the better of the two?

Looks – Samsung Galaxy Gear wins

One of the traditional problems with smartwatches was that they looked like blocky monsters, as if you’d strapped a retro 80s gadget to your wrist in hipster-esque fashion. The Sony SmartWatch 2 still has a whiff of this look.

We wouldn’t be surprised if the retro look is deliberate, but the blocky appearance of the ‘brain’ of the SmartWatch 2 is likely to put some people off. The Samsung Galaxy Gear has gone for a look that's smoother, with more continuous lines than previous smartwatches.

With the screen set to display a clock and nothing more, you could almost believe it’s just a new-fangled digital watch from Japan. The Gear also offers more customisation, with six strap colours and ten virtual clock faces. With the SmartWatch 2, you only really get to choose the colour of your rubbery watch strap.

Watch our Samsung Galaxy Gear hands-on video:

Screen – Samsung Galaxy Gear wins

Galaxy Gear yellowThe Samsung Galaxy Gear screen is a tiny bit bigger than the SmartWatch 2’s. It’s 1.63 inches across, next to the Sony’s 1.6-inch display. Both are pretty small.

However, there’s a big disparity in screen quality. The Sony SmartWatch 2 uses a fairly unremarkable 176 x 220 pixel LCD display, where the Galaxy Gear has a rather good 320 x 320 pixel Super AMOLED screen. It’s far sharper, and its screen type offers better sharpness and clarity than the Sony SmartWatch 2.

Weather resistance – Samsung Galaxy Gear wins

Both of these watches offer a bit of weather resistance. Sony says the SmartWatch 2 is water resistant, but shouldn’t be worn in the bath, or even the shower. So basically it rains you’ll be ok, but with anything remotely monsoon-like you’re looking at a dead digiwatch.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear is – once again – the more impressive of the two. It’s certified to the IP67 standard, meaning that it can be submerged in shallow water for up to 30 minutes. Take it in the shower? Why not? You could even risk taking it swimming, but we wouldn’t advise it.

Functionality – Samsung Galaxy Gear wins

Other than its higher-quality screen, the Galaxy Gear is the more expensive of the two watches because it packs in way, way more features. The SmartWatch 2 has NFC and Bluetooth to connect to a phone, and little else.

You need a Bluetooth headset to make calls with the thing and it doesn’t have an internal speaker. The SmartWatch 2 is really for relaying messages from your phone, and controlling things like music, and little else.

The Samsung Galaxy Gear is a different proposition altogether. In true Samsung fashion, it tries to do just about everything. It has a 1.9-megapixel camera, it has a gyroscope, it has an accelerometer. It has a speaker, and two microphones. This means you can take calls with it, monitor you movements with it, take photos and even video.

There is no competition here. The Galaxy Gear can do much, much more than the Sony. And while both have apps made for both watches, Samsung was keen to big-up that loads more apps are coming too. It'll have 70 for launch, apparently.

Power – Samsung Galaxy Gear wins

As it has to do many more demanding things, it’s no surprise that the Galaxy Gear has more powerful specs than the Sony SmartWatch 2. Both sound pretty weak by smartphone standards, though.

The Galaxy Gear has a single-core 800MHz processor, the SmartWatch 2 a piddly 200Mhz chip. The Gear also has 512MB of Ram and 4GB of internal storage. We don't know how much RAM the Sony smartwatch has - probably not much.

Connectivity – Samsung Galaxy Gear wins (but both lose really)

SmartWatch 2Both these phones use Bluetooth and NFC as their primary means of connecting with a phone. The NFC makes the connection and the Bluetooth actually transfers the data once the two are paired-up.

The Galaxy Gear has a slightly more advanced version of Bluetooth, version 4.0 where the SmartWatch uses 3.0. This makes the Gear compatible with Bluetooth Smart devices - designed for low power use.

However, the other connections you’d expect to find in a phone are absent. There’s no GPS, no Wi-Fi, no 3G. It’s all pretty basic.

GPS would have been a great addition to the Samsung Galaxy Gear, enabling it to function as a standalone sports watch. As-is, it can’t map your runs accurately without piggy-backing off a phone’s GPS, assuming it can even do that.

An IR transmitter would have been useful too, letting you control your TV with your watch. Gimmicky? Sure, but we are talking about smartwatches after all.

Price – Sony SmartWatch 2 wins

One clear win (finally) for the Sony SmartWatch 2 is price. It’s available for just £130 in the UK – you can pre-order it from a number of places online already.

The Galaxy Gear is much more expensive. It’s set to sell for $300 in the US, suggesting we’ll have to pay around £280-300 in the UK. That’s a whole lotta cash for a watch – on par with the rather special Garmin Forerunner 910XT GPS watch.

It makes us wonder – who on earth is going to buy a Galaxy Gear? It may be a lot better than the Sony in many respects, but the pricing makes the Sony SmartWatch 2 a far less daunting prospect.

Compatibility – Sony SmartWatch 2 wins

The Sony SmartWatch 2 is also far less demanding product in terms of the things it’ll work with. Right now the Galaxy Gear only work with the Note 3, with support for other Galaxy devices like the Galaxy S4, Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note 2 coming later in the year.

The SmartWatch 2 will work with any device running Android 4.0 or newer – that’s a whole shedload of phones and tablets. This is the main merit of producing a simpler, less feature-packed device. It doesn’t need a very specific phone on the other end to play with.


From a tech purist’s point of view, the Samsung Galaxy Gear is the much better smartwatch. It does more, it looks a bit better and it’s far more ambitious. However, we’re not convinced Samsung’s usual ‘more is better’ approach works here.

Perhaps we’ve be bowled over when we get to live with one for a while, but - stepping back for a while – the SmartWatch 2 might actually be the more sensible smartwatch.

Which would you prefer, if any? Let us know in the comments.

Read our full Samsung Galaxy Gear Hands-on


September 5, 2013, 4:44 pm

Battery life is the most important item on a smart watch its no good if it runs out of juice half the way through the day.gear has only 10 hours at most sony has 4 days , big processor equals short life.


September 5, 2013, 7:46 pm



September 5, 2013, 11:36 pm

Sorry Samsung have said the galaxy gear has a battery lice oh 25+ hours on one charge so not bad but its bad that u have to charge it every day tho


September 6, 2013, 1:11 am

Seems like samsung is going a little out of his way, 300..for a watch? really?!?!? i would go for sony anyday, battery life on gear is patethic, who would like to have a watch that doesnt last a day without a charge?


September 6, 2013, 7:41 am

both are terrible at being what you actually use a watch for; glance-able updates with an always on screen.


Dean Weaver

September 7, 2013, 7:50 pm

how long will the battery last ?


September 8, 2013, 2:00 pm

Watches need to be fussfree and have a point. The Samsung one looks like a 1990s Casio rather than a 80s casio, and frankly its need to be daily charged and provides what look like low use gimmicks mean it will likely fail the "watch requirement" tests. Eye of the beholder on this review


September 8, 2013, 2:02 pm

they also say their phones last twice as long as they do in the real world


September 8, 2013, 10:20 pm

Camera on a watch? If a man ever checks his email near a child then he risks being beaten senseless by the angry mob.


September 10, 2013, 10:53 am

What about the Omate truesmart on kickstarter, it can pair up or work standalone. It has GPS wifi etc. And it is cheaper!


September 11, 2013, 3:43 pm

This seems quite a biased review. It's very samsung weighted and some of the smartwatch facts are wrong.


September 24, 2013, 9:32 pm

The sony smartwatch 2 is IP57 certified so is water resistant to 1m for 30 mins.

Sebastian Pasus

October 1, 2013, 3:30 pm

i think sony is winner .......


October 30, 2013, 5:54 pm

IMHO it has to be able to make and answer calls, that would be the big convenience, not having to scramble to find and grab your phone when a call comes in. But $300 may be a little over the top for the functionality.

John Buchmann

December 26, 2013, 6:10 pm

$300 is a lot, but not "too" much, IMO. It's well made, and does WAY more than just tell the time/date, which many >$300 watches only do.

comments powered by Disqus