large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Dell UltraSharp UP3216Q Review - Image Quality, Screen Modes, Uniformity and Verdict Review


Dell UltraSharp UP3216Q – Image Quality

Dell says that each UP3216Q is calibrated at the factory to achieve a sub-2.0 Delta E out of the box, but the reality isn’t quite that simple.

By default, the Dell is set to use its Zonal Color Space mode. This option allows users to display different colour spaces in the left- and right-hand halves of the screen. This is useful for work, but not the ideal option when it comes to achieving accurate, consistent colours and contrast levels.

When measuring the Dell at its factory settings, the Delta E is a mediocre 4.21. That’s not the only area where there’s little to shout about: the colour temperature is a middling 7,560K; the Samsung U32E850R managed 6,311K.

The brightness level is 201 nits – the screen’s default option leaves brightness at 75% – and the black level is 0.21 nits. That makes for a contrast ratio of 957:1. The default brightness level isn’t anywhere near the Samsung’s 345-nit measurement, but the Dell’s contrast ratio and black levels are better – and the Samsung’s huge brightness is almost moot when the Dell’s result is ample for an office.
Dell Ultrasharp
Turning off the Dell’s Zonal Color Space setting made an instant difference. Deactivating that option also switches off Dynamic Contrast and Uniformity Compensation, and that meant Delta E improved to 1.65 – an excellent figure. With this setting turned off, the Dell improved in other areas, too: its maximum Delta E dropped from 9.63 to 5.62, and colour temperature improved to 6,971K.

So, while it isn’t entirely accurate that the UP3216Q achieves a sub-2 Delta E when it’s pulled from its box, getting to that point doesn’t take a huge amount of effort – it’s simply a matter of turning off Zonal Color and picking the colour profile most suited to the task at hand.

There’s something else to consider, too, in the form of the Dell’s colour temperature modes. These can be used to switch the panel’s colour temperature between eight different notches, but the default 6,500K option proved fantastic.

With this option selected, the screen’s average Delta E improved to 1.23 and its colour temperature warmed up to 6,980K. The only slight issue here was contrast: the middling brightness and black levels of 177 nits and 0.3 nits meant the contrast sat at 590:1.

Thankfully, the Dell didn’t have any problems displaying the huge number of colours produced by the sRGB and Adobe RGB gamuts. It displayed 99.6% of the sRGB gamut and 99.4% of the Adobe RGB gamut, which is right in line with Dell’s claims – and a little better than the Samsung.

It took a while to find the Dell’s best settings, then, but it’s worth jumping through the hoops. Turning off the UP3216Q’s Zonal Color Space sees the screen achieve Dell’s Delta E claims, and opting for the 6,500K colour temperature option saw those good results get even better.

Dell’s screen performs well when compared to the Samsung. With the Samsung settled at a 200-nit brightness level, it delivered a contrast ratio of 880:1 and black level of 0.39 nits. Neither of those figures is as good as the Dell without its Zonal Color Space option activated.

I calibrated the Dell by turning its green colour slider down a couple of notches, and its average Delta E improved to 0.6 while its other key measurements remained the same. That’s a great result, but this is one department where the Samsung is better – when calibrated, that screen improved to a stunning average Delta E of 0.09.

Dell UltraSharp UP3216Q – Screen Modes

Dell’s screen augments its sRGB and Adobe RGB colour modes with industry-standard REC709 and DCI-P3 settings. That’s a boon for those working in the content-creation fields, but neither of those modes can really be measured with a colorimeter – their benchmarks are way off-piste, but they’re not designed to excel in that type of test.

Dell’s screen doesn’t just have options for industry-standard working environments ; it has modes for different kinds of entertainment. Sadly, and as often happens with screens, these modes aren’t much use.

The Game mode’s Delta E of 2.58 is worse than the Dell’s normal modes, and the colour temperature cooled to 7,348K. The black level ramped up to 0.35 nits, too – a change designed to illuminate darker areas during gameplay, but one that also robs those shadowy areas of nuance and detail.

The Movie mode was no better. Its Delta E declined to 4.33, and the colour temperature sat at 12,783K. This is an extreme result that makes everything look far too pallid. The Multimedia mode sat between those two options, which means I wouldn’t use it.
Dell Ultrasharp

Dell UltraSharp UP3216Q – Uniformity and Input Lag

Dell’s panel proved capable when managing its colour temperature and accuracy levels across its 32in diagonal. The colour temperature barely changed across the top row of the screen, and that continued across the middle of the panel. There was only about 2% variance in colour temperature, which isn’t noticeable. And, impressively, the UP3216Q was even more on-point across its bottom row.

I can’t say the same about backlight uniformity. The Dell lost 15% of its backlight in the panel’s top-left corner, and that increased to 20% in the top-right corner. The middle of the screen lost between 10% and 16% of its brightness. The bottom row saw the screen lose up to 11% of its backlight power – a better result, but still not great.

Samsung performed similarly here. It lost up to 20.6% of its backlight in its top-left corner, and almost 9% of its colour temperature in some sectors.

The Dell’s middling uniformity isn’t a disaster, but it’s worth bearing in mind if you’re undertaking high-end graphical work. Given the nature of those tasks, however, it also might be worth investigating more expensive professional panels.

The Dell performs better when it comes to viewing angles. The size of the screen means that the corners can be a little darker when viewed from a central position, but this issue isn’t as pronounced as it is on the Samsung. There’s also only a slight darkening of the screen when it’s viewed from more oblique positions.

There’s little to choose between the Dell and the Samsung when it comes to input lag. The Dell’s average input time of 9.7ms is excellent – barely any different from the Samsung, and easily good enough for gaming. That’s particularly impressive given that this isn’t technically a gaming screen.
Dell Ultrasharp

Should I Buy the Dell UltraSharp UP3216Q?

Dell’s UltraSharp UP3216Q is a high-quality office monitor that gets it right in most of the important areas. It’s smart, versatile and sturdy, and it comes with screen modes that work with industry-standard settings – something most professional panels don’t include.

Screen quality is decent, too, even if it takes a little effort to get to the best settings. When it’s running at the peak of its capabilities, the Dell offers impressive colour accuracy, contrast and black levels, and it effortlessly produces the entirety of the Adobe RGB colour gamut. It throws up only minor issues: uniformity is necessarily tricky to maintain across such a large panel, and Samsung’s major rival is a little better when calibrated.

That Samsung screen is only better in a handful of areas. Its AMD FreeSync technology makes it a better option for after-hours gaming, and it’s a tad more versatile.

When it comes to getting work done, though, Dell’s screen excels thanks to a greater number of modes and better benchmark results. It’s a good option if full-on professional panels are too expensive.


Dell’s screen makes the user jump through a few hoops before its best settings come to light, but once it’s been properly set up there’s plenty to like. Its colour accuracy, contrast and gamut coverage levels are all top-notch. Other panels are better for multimedia, but this is an impressive large screen for work.

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Image Quality 9
  • Design 8
  • Value 8
  • Features 9

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.