OLED vs QLED: Television technology’s battle royale

OLED vs QLED: What’s the difference? We delve into the particularities of these two leading TV technologies.

Televisions have never been better, or more exciting, than they are today. This is partly because manufacturers have gone into competitive hyperdrive with new features such as 4K Ultra HD and HDR (high dynamic range). But it’s also because we’re seeing a no-holds-barred scrap – driven by the intense rivalry between Samsung and LG – between two different television screen technologies.

Both make their pictures in very different ways, and both come with quite distinct advantages and disadvantages. We’ll explain those differences here.

Related: What is 4K TV and Ultra HD? All you need to know about 4K

OLED vs QLED – How OLED works

OLED screens enable every pixel they contain to produce its own light. The clue to how they achieve this is in the technology’s full name: Organic Light Emitting Diode.

Each pixel is made from organic materials that light up when charged with electricity. The more electricity you apply to these organic materials, the brighter they’ll glow, with different materials being used to deliver different colours.

Since each OLED pixel needs its own electric current to work, you end up with a situation where every single pixel can work pretty much independently of even its nearest neighbours. This sort of pixel-level lighting precision has made the technology a firm favourite of home cinema fans over recent years.



OLED vs QLED – How QLED works

QLED is basically a fancy take on LCD TVs. The term itself recently underwent a significant change in meaning.

Prior to the CES in January 2017, QLED referred to future ‘self-emissive’ LED technology, where every pixel in an LED display makes its own light, similar to OLED screens. But then Samsung essentially (and controversially) rebranded QLED. Now, it refers to any TV that combines traditional LCD technology with Quantum Dots.

Quantum Dots are an alternative to the filters LCD TVs usually employ to make colour. They use an array of tiny dots of slightly different sizes that produce different wavelengths (and therefore colours) when light is applied to them.

Since each tiny ‘dot’ is focused on just one colour, QDs can produce bolder but also more precise colours than traditional filters. They can also make more efficient use of any light that hits them than a typical filter, yielding potential energy consumption advantages.

QLED TVs as they’re defined now still use external LED light sources to illuminate groups of pixels in normal LCD TV style.

Related: Best TV 2018: The most amazing TVs you can buy


QLED – Samsung Q9FN

OLED vs QLED – OLED advantages

1) Peerless black-level performance

Since every pixel in an OLED TV can make its own light, it’s possible to have a perfectly black pixel sitting right alongside a maximum-brightness white pixel.

It doesn’t take a leap of imagination to figure out that this individual pixel-level light control has the potential to deliver much more contrast and image light uniformity than any current LED solution.

This really comes into its own with today’s HDR sources, as it means HDR’s brighter image highlights can be delivered without compromising any dark areas that might be around them. There’s none of the general greying over of dark elements, or distracting light blooming or striping around bright elements, you get with LED TVs (depending on the type of backlighting they use).

2) Beautiful contrast

Being able to put deep black and bright white pixels beside each other without any compromise between the two has a stunning effect on a picture’s contrast. Torches flickering in a dark window, the moon in a night sky, stars in space, spotlights in dark buildings – all such picture elements enjoy a level of intensity on OLED screens that you just don’t get on any other current screen technology.

So pronounced can the difference in brightness be between the darkest and brightest parts of an OLED screen’s images, in fact, that very extreme contrast content can actually momentarily make OLED appear brighter than QLED.

3) Enhanced shadow detail

Being able to control the light level of every pixel potentially enables OLED TVs to reveal subtle shades and details in the darkest corners of pictures that can get ‘crushed’ out of QLED pictures.

This doesn’t always work out as you’d expect. Certainly many OLED TVs need quite carefully setting up to avoid crushing subtle detailing themselves. But the principle is sound, and borne out in our head-to-head comparisons of real-world TVs later.

4) Superior viewing angles

Since OLED TVs use self-emissive pixels, their pictures can be viewed from a much wider angle than those of QLED TVs before they start losing any significant colour and contrast.

This is clearly a big deal if your viewing room requires anyone to sit off down near the sides of the screen.

5) Unlocks the dark end of what HDR can do

While some refer to the introduction of HDR as creating a brightness race where TVs are concerned, the reality is that HDR is as much about the dark end of the light spectrum as the bright end. So while QLED can certainly put on a light show with HDR’s bright stuff, OLED is better equipped to unlock all that extended dark scene detail HDR can carry.


OLED – LG likes to make walls and tunnels with its TVs

OLED vs QLED – QLED advantages

1) Really bright

For decades, brightness wasn’t really a big deal in the TV world. The old ‘Rec. 709’ video standard just didn’t put much store in it. The arrival of HDR video, though, has suddenly put brightness on the TV map.

QLED TVs can run far more brightly than current OLED TVs. For instance, the 65-inch Samsung Q9FN can pump out a peak measured light output (on a white HDR window filling 10% of the screen) of 2400 nits.

The recently tested Hisense 75U9A Quantum Dot TV, meanwhile, punched in at 2700 nits with the same test signal. OLED TVs, by comparison, have yet to break the 1000-nit barrier.

2) More colour volume

Colour volume is the name given to measurements of colour at varying levels of brightness. So it kind of goes without saying that since QLED TVs can hit much higher brightness levels than OLED ones, they deliver measurably more of the sorts of colour volumes we see in the real world.

3) More lifelike HDR content

HDR video is currently defined as being capable of hitting peak brightness outputs of 10,000 nits. Most HDR content to date is mastered to peaks of 1000-4000 nits (or less). But this still provides plenty of breathing room for the brightness of QLED TVs to deliver much more of the sort of impact – at least during bright scenes – that HDR is designed to reproduce.

As well as delivering a bigger picture quality ‘jump’ from standard dynamic range to HDR during bright scenes, this extra brightness means that QLED screens can make HDR pictures look more lifelike. After all, one of the points of HDR is to enable screens to reproduce more of the light levels our eyes witness in the real world every day.

4) Immune to screen burn

Since QLED TVs don’t use organic elements, they are essentially immune to screen burn/image retention, whereby prolonged exposure to a particularly bright static image element – a channel logo, say, or part of a game HUD – can eventually leave a permanent shadow of that image element behind.

OLED TVs have improved greatly in this respect in recent years, and you can mitigate the risks of screen burn by taking care how you use an OLED screen – especially in the first 100 hours of its life. But this still isn’t as good as being immune to the issue like QLED screens are.

5) Easier/cheaper to manufacture

OLED TVs are notoriously difficult to make, meaning that panel yields were until recently low. This has tended to result in prices that have remained stubbornly high. QLED technology, by comparison, can be relatively straightforward to manufacture, costing only a small premium over standard LED TVs.

It should be stressed, though, that chief OLED manufacturer LG has started to make great strides with OLED production efficiencies lately – and OLED prices have finally started to shift significantly downwards as a result. Also, advanced QLED approaches, such as the metal-clad QDs in Samsung’s QLED TVs, can actually be quite expensive to produce.

Related: Sony ZF9 vs Samsung Q9FN


QLED – Samsung shows it’s not afraid of bright rooms

OLED vs QLED – The 2018 edition

We’ve seen some stunning efforts over the course of the year. LG, Panasonic, Philips and Sony have all delivered impressive OLED TVs and Samsung’s QLEDs have made a significant impact too. LG’s OLED55B8 is at the more affordable end, with a less power processor than the C8, but still capable of deep blacks, rich colours and gorgeous contrast.

Step up to the C8 and it gets even better; brighter and more detailed than the B8 can claim to be. But Samsung’s top of the line Q9FN is arguably even further ahead of that TV in terms of brightness, furthering QLEDs ability to play in rooms of various brightness. Black levels and shadow detail on the Q9FN aren’t as impactful as OLEDs can produce, but the distance between the two is not huge.

Philips’ OLED+903 were brighter than any other TV we saw and thanks to Philips P5 picture engine offered intense and vivid colours. It’s expensive, but does come with an integrated soundbar made by B&W, which sounds superb. That arguably makes Philips the most complete package on offer along with Panasonic’s flagship effort.

Panasonic, has come on leaps and bounds in recent years with its OLED performance, with its TVs championed by Hollywood artists to tune films. Accuracy is the name of the game here and few are as natural looking as the TX-55FZ952B.

And what about Sony? The A1 was an innovative effort, with a screen that vibrates to produce sound. The AF9 kept that trait and with Sony’s excellent motion processing in tow, it’s capable of an incredibly nuanced and beautiful image.

Regardless, whichever TV you plump for, performance across all of them is excellent.

OLED VS QLED – Which is better?

Trying to simply pick OLED over QLED or vice versa is a fool’s errand. The bottom line is that they both excel in different ways. And so they both suit different types of viewing conditions and picture preferences.

If you’re looking for a TV for a bright room, or something to give you the most consistent dynamism from HDR content, the top-end, direct-lit QLED TVs are the way to go. They’re brighter, deliver more ‘real-world’ colour volume, handle ambient light better and are immune to screen burn issues.

For darker conditions, though – at least for the sort of AV fans who value black-level depth and dark detailing over brightness – LG’s OLED TVs are the way to go. That is particularly the case if your room layout routinely requires someone to have to watch the TV from much of an angle.

Either way, my biggest takeaway from putting this article together is that anyone buying a TV in 2018 should feel very happy indeed to have such choices.