Home / TVs & Audio / TV / Samsung PS64F8500 / Picture Quality

Samsung PS64F8500 - Picture Quality

John Archer

By John Archer

Reviewed:

Awards

  • Editors choice
Samsung PS64F8500

Summary

Our Score:

10

Samsung PS64F8500 - Groundbreaking Contrast

Impressive and innovative though many aspects of Samsung’s Smart TV platform might be, though, the Samsung PS64F8500’s main event has to be its unexpectedly sensational picture quality – in particular its groundbreaking contrast. This finds the huge panel at the TV’s heart able to pump out the brightest, most dynamic images we’ve seen from a plasma TV, while simultaneously producing black colours with a richness and depth that’s streets ahead of anything Samsung has managed before.

In fact, let’s be quite clear about this: the Samsung PS64F8500’s black level response is so good it finally puts Samsung in the same league in this key picture quality respect as Panasonic. And you can’t say fairer than that. We’d even go so far as to say, in terms of sheer dynamism, that the PS64F8500’s pictures go beyond those found on the recently tested and totally brilliant Panasonic P42GT60.

Samsung PS64F8500

Samsung PS64F8500 - Sharpness

The Samsung PS64F85000’s pictures also excel with their sharpness and detailing. In fact, using the (generally rather over-cooked) factory picture presets HD material tends to look a bit too sharp, to the point where the image can start to be plagued by dot crawl and over-stressy edges. It’s only a few seconds work, though, to sort this initial harshness out – simply nudging down the sharpness setting should do it. And once you’ve reached the point where the fizzing sensation stops you’ve still got a gorgeously textured and crisp image.

The processing engine is good enough, meanwhile, to deliver standard definition sources with a greater sense of sharpness than you would expect to see on a 64-inch TV. This extra sharpness isn’t accompanied by the sort of exaggeration of source noise we might have expected to see – especially on such a monumentally large screen.

Not that we’d be particularly worried if the Samsung PS64F8500 was only an average standard def performer, to be honest. For with its access to multiple HD streaming platforms, built-in Freeview and Freesat HD tuners and the wide and affordable availability of Blu-rays, it’s hard to imagine anyone who buys this set using it for standard def viewing in anything but the rarest of circumstances.

Samsung PS64F8500 - Motion Handling

Another major area of improvement in the PS64F8500 versus previous Samsung plasma generations is its motion handling. In both 2D and 3D mode we really enjoyed how little resolution loss and judder we spotted, even during fast camera pans. The only rider to this is that you arguably need to use at least the lowest level of Samsung’s motion processing tools to get a really smooth 3D performance, but this processing can occasionally generate a few momentary side effects, such as shimmering around large moving objects, or the occasional panning twitch.

It’s worth stressing here, though, that possibly because the this set sees Samsung shifting over to a quad-core processing system, the motion processing on show with this flagship plasma set is far more clean and watchable than any previous Samsung engine.

Samsung PS64F8500 - Colours

The Samsung PS64F8500 even excels with its colour response. Initially tones look a bit over-aggressive thanks to Samsung’s typically over-bright, over-contrasty picture presets. But the set has more than enough picture adjustment tools – including full colour and gamma management suites – to let you to get colours looking exactly as your own tastes, or your preferred industry video standard, dictates.

Samsung PS64F8500

Samsung PS64F8500 - 3D

While 2D pictures look spectacular on the Samsung PS64F8500, it’s arguably 3D that benefits most from Samsung’s new-found plasma prowess. It's far brighter than your average plasma screen and this works wonders when it comes to combating the inevitable brightness reduction you get when you don a pair of active 3D shutter glasses.

As well as helping 3D images look more vibrant, colourful and punchy than they ever have before on a plasma TV, the extra dynamic range of the

Samsung PS64F8500’s 3D picture really helps when it comes to the TV portraying a deep, consistent and convincing sense of space, as it becomes easier to see the subtle background ‘markers’ that images use to help delineate their 3D space.

Motion looks far better in 3D than it ever has before on a Samsung plasma TV, and detail levels are immense, reminding you in no uncertain terms of active 3D’s resolution advantage – especially when it comes to delivering 3D on a TV as big as 64-inch.

Samsung PS64F8500 - Picture Technology

We couldn’t help but wonder after experiencing the Samsung PS64F8500’s picture glories just how Samsung had managed to bring its plasma performance on so far from its 2012 range. So we pestered the brand into providing us with a little insight. Arguably the most significant innovation has seen Samsung make the panel’s discharge space bigger, which immediately improves the screen’s luminance output. This first step has then been bolstered by the use of a new, more efficient discharge gas and a shift to the efficiency of Magnesium Oxide for the panel’s key conduction materials.

As for improving the Samsung PS64F8500 black level performance at the same time as drastically improving brightness, the main advances are a better Real Black Pro Filter (which soaks up more ambient light), speedier processing that enables the panel to hit its maximum brightness levels faster, and a new discharge waveform for boosting contrast.

toboev

April 29, 2013, 4:39 pm

What is the power consumption? Do you need to install air-con in the room?
Sorry, probably not a AVophile question :)

Prem Desai

May 3, 2013, 5:55 pm

Are these the only questions you have about this magnificent piece?

The power consumption WILL be higher than an LCD but over a year, this will equate to just a few pounds. A small price to pay.

No, you do not need air-con and you know it.

It has long been established that plasmas are far superior than LCDs for picture quality. It is refreshing to note that Samsung now acknowledge this and are pushing the right technology forward.

JF

May 16, 2013, 10:20 pm

336 kWh/year

Denzo

July 31, 2013, 12:46 pm

Just returned my LG LA8600 for the 64 inch version of this beast. I love the magic remote - but man once you notice light bleeding - I just cant stop noticing it. Solution? Get a plasma. So I walk into the store and I saw this TV and Im thinking to myself "what a nice LED TV - but those blacks are amazing". Then I found out more about it. Its bright, clear has real blacks - Im sold. Love this TV. for the next couple of years till OLED comes out, this is a real beast for pure picture quality. PS my ones quad core, and has the updated control box on the back.
I wonder sometimes if LCDs are cheaper to manufacture than PLASMA, cause if so, my business side is telling me why Manufacturers are pushing for LCD sales - bottom line. For quality? I think Plasma is hard to beat.. especially when going for a big TV like this you probably dim the lights occasionally and watch "movie style".. so Plasma has to be the way for me.

Paul

August 17, 2013, 11:45 pm

Good set, too bad about the motion blur which makes computer games unplayable

Anonymous

August 29, 2014, 10:52 pm

Samsung PN64F8500 Plasma Crowned King of HDTV by VE Shootout 2014...again?

That's right the Samsung F8500 has now became the very first HDTV to win the infamous VE Shootout back to back. In 2013
it was the battle of the Plasma's, between the Panasonic VT & ZT
series which are no longer available today as they quit production at
the end of 2013. Now the F8500 has won again in 2014 with the Highest Overall Average Score despite being pitted against the latest OLED & UHD 4K panels that cost as much as $120,000.00 !

This is quite a feat considering the placement of the HDTV during the
Shootout, because it was mounted high above the current 2014 lineup of
OLED & UHD 4K sets. This poor location gave the F8500 a clear
disadvantage, because it has an Anti-Glare Louvered Filter called the Real Black Pro Filter
which blocks out Ambient Light from Above and Below to allow for better
Contrast in Bright-Room situations. Because of it's high placement on
the wall, this Louvered Panel actually made the screen appear darker to
the rest of the voting audience.

Despite the poor placement the Audience and Experts both cast their Votes for their favorite HDTV in several categories including: Black Level, Contrast Ratio, Color Accuracy, Motion Resolution (Sharpness), Day Mode and General Content (Video Quality) and the Samsung F8500 came out as the Overall Winner!

Since the Samsung F8500 had the Highest Overall Score it wasn't a tie
just a marketing stunt to keep you interested in OLED tv's like the LG
55EC9300, because PLASMA tv's are on their way out thanks to the E.U
Energy Standards in a large part, but Plasma still remains King of
Picture Quality:

Score Tally from VE SHOOTOUT 2014:

#1) Samsung F8500: 52.01

#2) LG 55EC9300: 51.54

comments powered by Disqus