OPINION Rumours suggest that Samsung is lining up a purchase of chip maker AMD. Computing Editor, Edward Chester, looks at the arguments for and against such a move
Why Samsung should buy AMD
Rumours are circulating that tech-giant Samsung is about to buy struggling CPU and GPU manufacturer AMD, to bolster its fight against the likes of Intel and Qualcomm for semi-conductor supremacy. But with AMD wracked with debt and struggling to compete with Intel and Nvidia, what’s in it for both parties? Let’s break it down.
Samsung gets AMD’s IP
The most obvious beneficiary here would be Samsung as it would get access to AMD’s CPU and GPU IP, allowing the company to incorporate these technologies into its own chips.
On an even more base level, Samsung could simply pocket the IP and be safe in the knowledge it can now use a whole load of technologies without paying any license fees or fearing litigation. It could literally shutter AMD as a chip producing entity and sit pretty on that IP. It’s unlikely it would do that as the deal would likely not be approved if that looked likely to happen, and AMD does still have some viable product lines that Samsung could continue to produce.
Samsung gets an x86 license
A specific benefit of gaining access to AMD’s IP is that Samsung would be buying one of only two companies that is licensed to produce x86 processors, along with VIA and of course the licenser Intel. This would open up a raft of possibilities for Samsung to produce a range of processors for desktops, laptops, tablets and even phones. With its existing expertise with mobile chip manufacturing it could seriously take the fight to Intel as that company tries desperately to make inroads in the mobile space.
Samsung gets the console chips
One of the biggest design-wins for AMD in the last few years has been getting its chips into all the main consoles. The PS4 and Xbox One both use AMD APUs while the Wii U also uses AMD-designed graphics. While AMD isn’t making a huge amount of money from these chips the idea is they provide long term revenue, given the long production life of these consoles.
It’s also more likely that any subsequent console will use AMD APUs as the transition for manufacturers and developers will be easier. That is, of course, dependent on their being future new consoles. Some say there won’t be, but that’s hard to predict right now.
AMD gets Samsung production
Potentially one of the greatest benefits of any potential deal will actually be for AMD, as it would get access to Samsung’s world-class chip manufacturing facilities.
Sign up for the newsletter
Get news, competitions and special offers direct to your inbox
While Intel has been able to produce 14nm finFET products for around 9 months and Samsung has also had about 6 months of production, TSMC is only just transitioning to 16nm and Global Foundries isn’t at full 14nm production yet either.
Not that it’s as easy as copying and pasting a design from one manufacturing process to another, but there’s potential for AMD to have a more rapid transition to the most competitive silicon production facilities. As a result its APUs, CPUs and GPUs could be faster and more energy efficient, making them far more competitive with Intel and Nvidia.
AMD gets investment
Currently AMD is in a fair amount of debt. While this has been hanging over the company’s head for years and not affected it too much, it would still be beneficial to get rid of that burden if only to change the overall mindset of the company.
Not only could a Samsung acquisition pay off that debt but there could also be significant investment that would help push the company’s products back into more competitive territory.
SEE ALSO: Why your next monitor should have AMD FreeSync
Why Samsung shouldn’t buy AMD
So those are the arguments in favour, but what about the opposite. Are there reasons for Samsung or AMD to back away from the deal, and what are the implications for consumers?
AMD could lose its x86 license
The most direct threat to any potential deal between the two companies could simply be that Intel pulls the x86 license from AMD/Samsung, leaving the company without the right to produce desktop/laptop CPUs.
The exact details of how this licensing agreement is structured is unclear,but it’s perfectly possible there are clauses that allow Intel to cancel the current deal. Moreover it could choose to not renew the license when it’s next up for renewal.
It’s unlikely Intel would do this, as it still makes money from selling the license, but if backed into a corner it’s a move it could make.
Samsung could shutter AMD
As mentioned earlier, there is a chance that Samsung is out to buy AMD simply to grab its IP and save itself a load of headaches in terms of existing license agreements and for if and when it decides to make new chip designs.
While it’s unlikely Samsung would be allowed to do anything immediately, it could well look to ramp down production of things like AMD’s Radeon graphics cards and generally move away from the traditional PC/enthusiast space.
Job losses could be significant
As well as impacting consumers the more obvious loss would be in jobs at key AMD sites. Again, it’s unlikely the deal would be allowed if this was the intention but you never know, a few years down the line.
The real question, then, is what’s in it for AMD? Clearly its shareholders would get a bit of cash, but from the perspective of its employers and the consumers that use its products, the picture is far less clear. Nvidia needs a strong competitor on the graphics card front to keep prices and innovation going in the right direction, and Samsung simply may not be interested in pursuing that market. Meanwhile AMD’s CPU/APU division could well find itself shrunk as Samsung moves away from trying to compete directly with Intel on the desktop/laptop front and instead concentrates on dominating the mobile market.
Of course, it could simply be that Samsung chooses to run AMD as a separate subsidiary for the foreseeable future, in the same way that Lenovo has done with Motorola, and the overall result for consumers would probably be beneficial in the short to medium term.