Refine search for Digital Cameras
Panasonic Lumix FX37 Review
| Author | Cliff Smith |
| Published | 5th Sep 2008 |
| Manufacturer | Panasonic |
| Price | £200.00 (Exc VAT) |
| as reviewed | £230.00 (Inc VAT) |
| Latest Price | Click here |
| Build Quality | ![]() |
| Features | ![]() |
| Image Quality | ![]() |
| Value | ![]() |
| Overall | ![]() |
It was only a few months ago that I reviewed the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX35, an expensive but superb 10-megapixel, 4x zoom ultra-compact with a class-leading 25mm wide-angle ability, to which I awarded a well-deserved Recommended rating. Never content, the relentless juggernaut of the global consumer economy rolls ever onward, and so inevitably Panasonic has announced yet another incremental upgrade, with the launch of this, the DMC-FX37.

Anyone who's read my review of the FX35 might be forgiven for thinking that I'd simply re-used the same product shots. I didn't, but I probably could have done because the two cameras are outwardly almost identical. They are exactly the same size, exactly the same weight, have the same size monitors and identical controls. In fact the only outward sign that they are in fact different cameras is the model number on the top plate, and the maximum focal length written around the front of the lens. Where the FX35 had a 4x, 25-100mm equivalent zoom range, the FX37 has a 5x, 25-125mm zoom, for those times when 100mm just isn't quite enough.

The FX37 is currently selling for around £230, which is a lot of money for a compact camera. It hasn't been out long, and usually camera prices do tend to fall over time, but it's worth noting that the FX35 is now selling for £178, which is more than it was when I reviewed it in June. By comparison the Nikon S600 is now available for under £200, while the Canon IXUS 860 IS has dropped to £170. Is that extra 25mm of focal length really worth over £50?
Latest 4 of 5 Comments
Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.
DVR said on 11th November 2008
Jimmy said on 15th January 2009
It's evident FX37's image quality made a step forward from FX35, so I'll also have to agree with nout and DVR; what was/is the reviewer thinking?
Keith said on 25th January 2009
Where is the Conclusions page? Judging by the comments and the score of 7 there were some negative comments in the Conclusion - as I am considering this camera I would like to read... more
DougM said on 2nd April 2009
Once again, as I said in my comments on the FX500, I don't really understand Cliff's rating criteria, because the FX35 gets a better value rating when the price of it and... more
See all 5 comments on this article.
Add your comment
You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.






5 comments
Email
TrustedReviews Newsletters
Indeed, I don't really understand what's happening here..
If you open and compare the test shots made by FX35 and FX37 on this site, you can clearly see that pictu... more