- Review Price: £1450
Recognising that a lot of the lens-plus-camera mass could reside in the lens, Pentax has very sensibly equipped its 60-250mm zoom with a tripod-mounting collar that better balances the combination and avoids stressing the host camera’s base-plate.
Less obvious benefits include a weatherproof rubber ring on the mounting flange and Super Protect (SP) coating on the front element. And the lens hood is a petal type that provides better shading than is possible with a simpler cylindrical type.
Inside there is a Sonic Drive Motor (SDM) AF system that is exceptionally quiet but which also proved to be exceptionally slow on the K200D body used for this review. To be fair, the K200D is getting somewhat long in the tooth and AF speed on a more recent host body should be considerably quicker.
Handling is excellent thanks to the overall proportions of the lens. The rear half of the barrel is home to a broad zoom ring that is marked with focal-lengths at 60mm, 85mm, 135mm, 200mm and 250mm. The mechanism is a little heavy but very smooth.
The rotatable tripod-mounting collar sits behind the zoom ring: if it hinders hand-held operation then removal of the mounting plate is very straightforward by slackening the screw that acts on a spring-loaded locking claw. This is a much simpler system than having to remove the entire collar.
The front half of the barrel contains an equally broad manual-focusing ring and a focused-distance window. The movement is smooth, offers just the right amount of resistance and acts across a relatively short 50-degree throw, making focusing very quick.
This in turn made the K200D’s slow AF performance all the more frustrating. Focusing is internal so there is no need to keep fingers clear of the MF ring: in fact manual adjustments can be applied at any time so there is every reason to adopt a grip that covers the zoom ring and MF ring with equal ease.
Technical testing produced an outstanding set of MTF curves that, except for wide-open at 60mm, remained above the crucial 0.25 cycles-per-pixel threshold for all focal lengths and all aperture settings. In view of the high peak resolutions and consistency measured, the full 20/20 score has been awarded despite the one exception noted. Some chromatic aberration was observed in technical images but not to any significant extent in any real-world testing.
Overall this is a very capable lens but it is also a costly one. Photographers who genuinely need its f/4 constant maximum aperture and weatherproofing measures will doubtless be willing to invest in a lens of such quality but others may rightly hesitate. More importantly, potential buyers who are using older-generation Pentax digital bodies should definitely check the zoom’s performance on their own cameras rather than relying on an in-store test undertaken using a different body.
Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.