- Page 1 NEC/Mitsubishi MultiSync LCD 2080UX+ Review
- Page 2 NEC/Mitsubishi MultiSync LCD 2080UX+ Review
- Review Price: £1291.00
There’s definitely a bit of an identity crisis going on at the NEC/Mitsubishi offices. Although the company is definitely called NEC/Mitsubishi, the LCD based products seem to be branded NEC while the CRT displays are badged Mitsubishi. Of course since Mitsubishi has consistently produced high-quality CRT monitors and NEC has a strong reputation in the LCD market, there is some method behind this madness.
The MultiSync 2080UX+ is currently at the top of the NEC/Mitsubishi LCD range with a 20in diameter and a native resolution of 1,600 x 1,200. This is fantastic resolution to work with, especially if you constantly have multiple windows open like I do. It’s extremely useful if you find yourself cutting and pasting regularly from one window to another.
The LCD panel in the 2080UX+ is superb and the viewing angle is every bit as good as the ViewSonic VP211b I looked at a couple of months ago. The image produced is very bright and the colours are vivid and vibrant, just the way I like a TFT to be. There are no problems with uneven lighting, and if there were any dead pixels in the review sample I looked at, I couldn’t see them. Even using DisplayMate the 2080UX+ performed beautifully with very uniform colour gradations.
The design of the 2080UX+ isn’t what I’d call aesthetically pleasing, but then this is a pretty subjective issue. Personally I like black monitors, but unfortunately TCO has moved the goal posts again. Although a monitor manufacturer can produce a black monitor and still receive TCO’99 accreditation, in order to get TCO’03 accreditation the bezel surrounding the screen can not be black. So, although I don’t like the colour of this monitor very much, it’s not really NEC/Mitsubishi’s fault. However, looking closely at the 2080UX+ you’ll see that the bezel is in fact silver, but the rest of the monitor is beige. Since it’s only the bezel that can’t be black, the rest of the monitor could happily be black. But, as I said, colour is subjective.
Something that’s less subjective is the design of the stand, and here NEC/Mitsubishi has done a very good job, in some areas at least. Most welcome is the vertical movement of the screen. The stand column is telescopic and allows the screen to be moved up and down with only the slightest amount of pressure. This again is similar to the ViewSonic VP211b, but unfortunately the 2080UX+ doesn’t have handy cable clips running down the back of the telescopic column to keep the cables out of the way. The result is that the cables are visible at the bottom of the screen. That said, there is a panel that you can clip to the rear of the stand to route the cables through. Unfortunately it’s not a very elegant solution and makes the rear of the monitor look untidy. This is a shame because the cable router on the 17in NEC TFT screen is far better integrated.
You can also tilt the screen both forwards and backwards to achieve your perfect viewing angle. There’s a swivel plate in the bottom of the stand that allows you to turn the whole unit from side to side. I personally prefer having the mounting column rotating rather than the whole unit, but the up side of this design is that the screen can be twisted right through 360 degrees if necessary.
Also like the ViewSonic screen, the 2080UX+ will pivot into portrait mode. Unfortunately NEC/Mitsubishi doesn’t supply any software to switch your desktop around to portrait mode when you do this. That said, most of the latest video card drivers will include this option, so it’s not too much of an issue. In fact I used the pivot utility in the nVidia driver and it worked perfectly with the 2080UX+. NEC/Mitsubishi hasn’t made the OSD rotate when the screen pivots though.
Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.