large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

AOpen Aeolus FX5900XT Review


rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Key Specifications

  • Review Price: £149.00

Things never stay still for very long in the graphics business but even I was surprised by the speed with which nVidia released its latest chip. Though the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra appeared only a few weeks ago, nVidia has already released another chip out into the wild.

What’s even more surprising is that the GeForce FX 5900XT is evidently aimed at the same mid-range market as the GeForce FX 5700 series. Indeed the XT moniker is a clear sign that nVidia intends to steal the thunder from ATi’s Radeon 9600XT.

Architecturally the differences between the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and the GeForce FX 5900 are interesting. The former uses DDR2 memory running at a blistering 900MHz, while the GPU operates at an impressive 475MHz. The GeForce FX 5900XT, meanwhile, features less impressive numbers – only 700MHz DDR1 memory and 390MHz for the GPU. Its secret though is its internal 256bit data bus, derived form its bigger 5900 brother, as opposed to the slower 128bit interface used in the 5700 Ultra. This 256bit bus delivers a maximum potential 22.4GB/s second of memory bandwidth. This is up from the 14.4GB/s available to the 5700 Ultra and significantly eclipsing the Radeon 9600XT 9.6GB/s. As we’ll see, this brain versus brawn approach pays serious performance dividends and gives lots of headroom for running anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering at high resolutions.

Though many manufactures have started producing ATi-based boards, there’s still no shortage of partners churning out products showcasing nVidia’s talents. AOpen is one such manufacturer. With the FX5900XT it has taken a bare bones approach but that’s no bad thing. There’s no outrageous card design or heatsinks on the RAM and no box filling bundle. However for most people that’s going to be just fine. No need for a bunch of half-baked utilities and demos of games you’ll never play. All that’s in the box is a driver disc and a copy of Intervideo WinCinema consisting of WinDVD4 and WinRip – an MP3 encoder and organiser. There’s also a simple colour guide to help those who might not have upgraded their graphics card before.

The card itself features an interesting looking fan, which might be of interest if you’re of the transparent case brigade. Noise levels are reasonable. It’s not as quiet as the MSi GeForce FX 5700 Ultra, but at least the days of nVidia cards sounding like jet engines are long gone. The rear of the card sports a DVi port with a D-SUB adapter provided. There’s also a second D-SUB port so you can hook up two displays. As you might expect at the price, there’s no ViVo functionality but there is a TV-Out, with an S-Video to composite adapter in the box.

So on to benchmarking. We ran a number of tests on the card, including our new custom Tomb Raider test, designed specifically to determine DirectX 9 performance. The results were pretty impressive beating the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and a Hercules 9600XT card in practically every test. Starting with 3DMark03, at a default resolution, the AOpen scored 4995 compared to 3180 for the 5700 Ultra and 3679 for the 9600XT. In X2, at an intensive 1,280 x 1,024 with both anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering enabled, the AOpen breezed past both the 5700 Ultra and the 9600XT with 26.7 fps to their 19.5 and 20.5 respectively. As you can see from the graphs it also dominated at Unreal Tournament 2003. In the graphics stressing Halo, it was the only one of the three to produce a really comfortable score at 1,024 x 768 with a healthy 42.7 fps. Tomb Raider revealed the same – a generous 51.4 fps compared with to 29.8 fps for the Hercules 9600XT. As for image quality – while the ATi card can render DX9 effects with a greater internal precision, when we ran Tomb Raider on two systems side by side, one with the nVidia card and the other with the ATi and we couldn’t spot any difference while the game was playing.

From the scores, it’s clear that nVidia has firmly staked a claim for the performance crown at the mid-range. In response, the price of the 9600XT has already dropped, but at only £20 difference there seems little point penny pinching. With the news that Half-Life 2 is to be delayed until possibly September 2004, the voucher that comes with the ATi cards is a far less enticing prospect, especially as it’s only for the single player game. However, while nVidia can be satisfied with outpacing ATi, I have to admit to being confused as to where the 5900XT leaves the still paint fresh 5700 Ultra, especially when manufacturers are pricing the former as keenly as AOpen are. If I’d shelled out for a 5700 Ultra last week, I’d be pretty miffed right now.

The good news for the rest of us though, is that with the GeForceFX 5900XT, superb performance can be had for a sensible amount of money. Add the potential for overclocking into the mix, and the ball is very firmly back in nVidia’ court.


nVidia raises the bar on mid–range performance with the very impressive GeForceFX 5900XT. It leaves both the ATi Radeon 9600XT and the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra out in the cold.

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Value 9
  • Features 8
  • Performance 9

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.