Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

AI judges of beauty contest branded racist

It’s not the first time artificial intelligence has been in the spotlight for apparent racism, but Beauty.AI’s recent competition results have caused controversy by clearly favouring light skin.

The competition, which ran online and was open to men and women around the world of all ages, ended with almost entirely winners with white skin, leading to the cries of robot racism.

However, given that AI is only as smart as the data sets it’s trained on, that could be overstating the point. Robots have no way of being inherently racist. An alternate headline could be ‘Failed research methodology leads to biased results’, but that’s hardly as compelling reading.

Indeed, Alex Zhavoronkov, Beauty.AI’s chief science officer said the results were a lack of ethnic minorities in the training data set. This meant that although light skin wasn’t defined as part of beauty, the AI drew the association anyway.

That oversight, or shortcoming, of the research meant that despite the whole aim of the competition being to eliminate human bias by judging on specific criteria, and it still crept in anyway.

Earlier in the year, an AI Twitter chatbot created by Microsoft called Tay had to be taken offline after just 24 hours after being taught to become a sex-obsessed racist.

Clearly, we need to find a way to train AI more robustly.

Related: Microsoft apologises for AI Twitter chatbot’s neo-Nazi, sex-mad tirades

Watch: iPhone 7 vs Galaxy S7

Do you think robots can be racist, or do you think it’s always bad data provided by humans? Let us know in the comments below.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.