large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Here’s how much YouTube’s top earners made last year

It’s no secret that there’s plenty of cash to be made peddling premium content on YouTube.

You might be shocked at the scale of the earnings however, which have now been revealed in a new Forbes report.

The article ranks this year’s top ten earners based on capital gained through YouTube in the 12 months leading up to June 1, 2015.

Taking top spot is – no surprise here – PewDiePie, who’s made his fortune off the back of video game playthrough videos.

However, while two gamers feature on the list, there’s by no means a monopoly. The roster also features comedy acts, musical talent, and make-up sages.

Check out the full list below:

  1. PewDiePie – $12 million
  2. Smosh – $8.5 million
  3. Fine Brothers – $8.5 million
  4. Lindsey Stirling – $6 million
  5. Rhett & Link – $4.5 million
  6. KSI – $4.5 million
  7. Michelle Phan – $3 million
  8. Lilly Singh – $2.5 million
  9. Roman Atwood – $2.5 million
  10. Rosanna Pansino – $2.5 million

Maybe it’s time to quit your day job.

Related: Best Web Browser 2015

Were you surprised by the YouTube stars’ earnings? Let us know in the comments.

Check out our smartphone buyer’s video guide below:

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.