Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

The Galaxy Fold’s problems go deeper than the not-a-screen-protector

As you’ve no doubt already heard, several tech journalists and well-known industry personalities are reporting that their Samsung Galaxy Fold review units have already broken, after less than two days of use. Worse still, the issue isn’t clear cut.

“A limited number of early Galaxy Fold samples were provided to media for review. We have received a few reports regarding the main display on the samples provided. We will thoroughly inspect these units in person to determine the cause of the matter,” reads Samsung’s official statement.

“Separately, a few reviewers reported having removed the top layer of the display causing damage to the screen. The main display on the Galaxy Fold features a top protective layer, which is part of the display structure designed to protect the screen from unintended scratches.

“Removing the protective layer or adding adhesives to the main display may cause damage. We will ensure this information is clearly delivered to our customers.”

YouTuber Marques Brownlee and Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman say they did remove the protective layer. Why? Because it looks like a regular screen protector − the kind you’ll find on all new phones and tablets.

Trusted Reviews’ mobiles editor Max Parker, who went hands-on with the Galaxy Fold at an event on Monday, says he was told not to remove the protective layer by reps.

“The outer-layer of the display is quite noticeable (especially around the edges) and I did first think it was a pre-attached screen protector Samsung had somehow forgot to mention,” Max told me.

“I was quickly told by reps on hand at the Samsung briefing that it was actually part of the display itself. Unless this is communicated super-clearly to consumers I can imagine lots of people peeling this layer off thinking it was just a cheap protector that didn’t have to be there”

Unfortunately, it appears that not all journalists were warned.

Consumer units, it appears, will ship with an instruction reading: “The main screen includes a special protective layer. Peeling off the protective layer or using any adhesives on the main screen, such as screen protectors or stickers , may cause damage.”

Review units, unfortunately, did not ship with that warning.

However, the plot thickens further. The Verge’s Dieter Bohn and CNBC’s Steve Kovach and Todd Haselton say their Galaxy Fold review samples broke despite the fact they didn’t remove the protective layer.

“CNBC didn’t remove that layer, and our screen is now also failing to work properly. When opened, the left side of the flexible display, which makes up a large 7.3-inch screen, flickers consistently,” CNBC explains.

Bohn says he could see and feel a “small bulge” directly on the crease of his review unit before it started malfunctioning.

“It’s just enough to slightly distort the screen, and I can feel it under my finger. There’s something pressing up against the screen at the hinge, right there in the crease. My best guess is that it’s a piece of debris, something harder than lint for sure. It’s possible that it’s something else, though, like the hinge itself on a defective unit pressing up on the screen.”

All of which indicates that there’s more than one thing wrong with the Galaxy Fold. According to The Wall Street Journal’s Joanna Stern, Samsung’s PR team has said the company has no plans to push back the handset’s release.

April 26 is when pre-orders go live in the UK. We’d recommend waiting for this story to play out before even considering shelling out £1799 for one.

Were you considering buying a Galaxy Fold? Have you changed your mind? Let us know on Twitter @TrustedReviews.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.