Home / Cameras / Camera / Panasonic Lumix FZ48

Panasonic Lumix FZ48 review

Audley Jarvis

By

Reviewed:

1 of 36

Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Panasonic Lumix FZ48
  • Lumix FZ48 4
  • Lumix FZ48
  • Lumix FZ48 1
  • Lumix FZ48 2
  • Lumix FZ48 3

Summary

Our Score:

7

User Score:

Pros

  • Flexible zoom range
  • Easy to use
  • Good movie-recording abilities

Cons

  • Some image quality issues
  • Removal of Raw recording a step backwards
  • EVF isn't great

Key Features

  • 12.1-megapixels
  • 24x optical zoom
  • 1080p Full HD movie recording
  • Power O.I.S image stabilisation
  • Creative Control digital filters
  • Manufacturer: Panasonic
  • Review Price: £319.99

While at first glance the FZ48 looks remarkably similar to the FZ45 model it supersedes, there are in fact several notable differences between the two models, some of which are clearly improvements, while others are more debatable.

Internally, the most major thing that has changed is the sensor. While both cameras use standard 1/2.3in size compact sensors, the one inside the FZ45 delivers 14.1MP of effective resolution, whereas the FZ48 takes a newly developed Hi-Speed CCD chip that is capable of outputting at 12.1MP. In addition, the newer model also gets the latest Venus Engine FHD II image processor.

Panasonic’s decision to reduce resolution strikes us as a manifestly sensible decision, and one that’s very much in keeping with the recent trend from manufacturers to scale back overall resolution to concentrate on improving other aspects of image quality, such as low-light performance. It’s worth bearing in mind that 12.1MP is still plenty enough to make decent enlargements of your images with, so you’re not really losing out.

Images are recorded in the default 4:3 aspect of the 1/2.3in sensor, with the maximum output at full resolution being 4000 x 3000 pixels. Other aspect options include 3:2, 16:9 and 1:1 all at slightly reduced maximum resolutions. Sensitivity stretches from ISO 100 to 1600 with no reduced resolution High Sensitivity options to call upon. This is a very narrow range for a camera of this price and type, with most of the FZ48’s direct competitors (and the Panasonic Lumix FZ150) offering at least ISO 3200 or beyond.

Mike B

September 26, 2011, 9:30 pm

Which super-zoom bridge camera around the £300 mark do suggest is better than this? Most have similar IQ issues or cost more.

tean

September 27, 2011, 3:46 am

Hi,

I own an FZ35/38 the image quality is very good and the user interface is equally good, not up to the image reproduction from M4/3 cameras like GF1/2/3. However I enjoyed using the camera. The images(Jpeg) from my this camera from my US trips were very good.

Looks like the subsequent models of FZ series the image quality have not live up to expectations and in fact deteriorate. The designers have other priorities in mind like giving it more zoom, HD video, etc. I assume they the same or similar sensor from compact cameras, and it has reached the peak of its image reproduction capabilities.

Those who want a super zoom should look for an FZ35/38 second unit at Ebay. Some even like the older unit like FZ50.

comments powered by Disqus