Refine search for Digital Cameras

Ricoh GR Digital III Review

Author Cliff Smith
Published 15th Sep 2009
Manufacturer Ricoh
Price £460.87 (Exc VAT)
as reviewed £530.00 (Inc VAT)
Latest Price Click here
Build Quality Score 10 for Build Quality
Features Score 7 for Features
Image Quality Score 10 for Image Quality
Value Score 4 for Value
Overall Score 8 for Overall
Ricoh GR Digital III
Bookmark and Share discuss this article  15 comments    Email  Email trustedreviews newslettersTrustedReviews Newsletters

In the thin air of the highest summit of the digital compact camera market you'll find a small and frostbitten handful of very expensive cameras to which the clichéd photography journalist's ultimate accolade can be applied; the Real Photographer's Camera. We've reviewed or reported on most of them, models like the fantastic Panasonic LX3, the stalwart Canon G10 and its newly announced replacement the G11, Canon's other newcomer the S90, the Nikon P6000 and the technically impressive if somewhat flawed Sigma DP2. Often overlooked among such exclusive company is one of the best "photographer's cameras" of the lot, the superb Ricoh GR Digital II. Today I'm taking a look at the successor to this camera, unexpectedly named the GR Digital III.


When Ricoh launched the original GR Digital in 2005 it was a bold and ambitious concept: a pocket-sized compact camera aimed at enthusiast photographers, offering SLR-like manual exposure controls, a large sensor, a fast hybrid AF system and a very high quality non-zoom wide-angle lens, in that case an f/2.4 equivalent to 28mm. Like an SLR it had a range of optional accessories, including a clip-on optical viewfinder and a 0.75x extension lens. At the time it was unlike anything else on the market, and didn't have much competition apart from Canon's aging flagship the PowerShot G6 and the ugly but awesome Olympus C-7070, both of which were big heavy cameras and far from pocket-sized.


The new GR Digital III follows exactly the same design concept, in fact it's so similar that at first glance it's hard to tell the two cameras apart, and harder still to distinguish it from its immediate predecessor the GR Digital II. However a closer inspection reveals that there are a number of improvements for the new model, and not insignificant ones either. The main upgrade is a completely new lens. It's still a fixed-length lens equivalent to 28mm, but it now has a maximum aperture of an impressive f/1.9, which if I'm not mistaken makes it the fastest lens on any current digital compact camera.


Also improved is the LCD monitor which is larger at three inches, but also much sharper with a resolution of 920,000 dots, the same as the monitors used on top-end professional DSLRs. The new model also gets a new image processor, the GR Engine III, and new more powerful 1250mAh Li-ion battery. More importantly it also gets a new sensor, a larger 1/1.7-inch type CCD with bigger photocells for improved light sensitivity.

 

Newsletters

Register to receive the latest Reviews and News Headlines directly to your Inbox every day, and enter our regular competitions. More Info.

Your Name


Email Address


Latest 4 of 15 Comments

Have your say: Leave a comment below about this article.

comment Voldenuit said on 16th September 2009

@miha: The blurriness is probably a function of focus distance. Had Landscape mode or infinity focus been chosen (and maybe stopping down further to f/8 or smaller), the picture wo... more

comment Frank said on 16th September 2009

Sorry to be picky, it is after all a compact and all that, , , but in some shots the colour of the pebbles seems a bit off, a pinkish hue or very very slight tint seems present, I ... more

comment Frank said on 16th September 2009

And another thing while I remember ;
Since I always bitch/complain/deride/point out/bring to the attention of. No Viewfinder on most compacts these days, even expensive ones... more

comment purephase said on 16th September 2009

I see what you're saying Ed - I just think that when potential buyers look at pages like yours where the ISO is tested to failing point, they may draw the conclusion that there is ... more

See all 15 comments on this article.

add comment Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment. Login or register here.