Home / Computing / Printer / Canon PIXMA MG2150 / Performance and Verdict

Canon PIXMA MG2150 - Performance and Verdict

By Simon Williams



Our Score:


User Score:

Canon’s performance specs for the PIXMA MG2150 are modest and therefore more likely to be truthful. It claims black text speeds of up to 8.4ppm and under test we saw 6.8ppm on our 5-page text document, rising to 6.9ppm on the 20-page one. These are close to claims and fair speeds for what is a budget machine. Colour speeds aren’t so promising.

Printing our 5-page black text and colour graphic page produced just 1.7ppm, against a spec of 4.8ppm. This was mainly due to a series of pauses during printing, when the printer appeared to be doing nothing. We repeated the test, to check it wasn’t an aberration, and saw an identical time. We expect pauses in duplex print to allow for ink drying, but they are unusual in single-sided print.

The machine also sometimes performed housekeeping tasks amounting to 30s or more before starting printing. It was only fair at copying, too, taking 45s for a single colour page copy. A 15 x 10cm photo printed at best quality on Canon Platinum Pro paper took 1:37. This is no speed merchant.

Canon PIXMA MG2150 - Speeds and Costs

Print quality is very good for an inexpensive printer, with dense, sharp black text and faithful colours. There’s a little bit of fuzz around emboldened headings, but nothing to get too worried about and the fast, draft mode is very serviceable. Photos are as good as any you’ll see from a printer under £100, with natural colours and sharp images.

There are only two cartridges in this machine; one black and the other tri-colour, but they are available in two capacities, with the high yield parts offering 600 and 400 pages, respectively. At the best prices we could find, this gives a black page cost of 3.9p and a colour one of 8.5p.

Canon PIXMA MG2150

These are good costs for a budget machine; manufacturers often boost consumable prices to recoup low selling prices. Both black and colour are lower than from the HP Deskjet 1050, for example.


This is a good, budget all-in-one, which is easy to use and maintain, though it’s paper feed system doesn’t show Canon’s normal design flair. Black speed is good and printed output is as good as from more expensive machines, but there are too many pauses in colour jobs. At least long term running costs are low, given the asking price, and worth balancing off against printers with a lower initial price tag.


August 24, 2012, 3:34 pm

You left out the most important part of a printer review. Ink being the most expensive item of any printer. Considering there are just 2 cartridges, will the printer still function when one has gone empty?


August 27, 2012, 12:07 am

You can print black and white or greyscale when the colour has run out but otherwise you'll need to replace the cartridges when they run out.


January 8, 2013, 7:38 pm

This may seem like a silly question but Is the Printer compatible with Apple products?


August 27, 2013, 10:00 am

This printer is probably the worst ink eater I have ever owned. If there is a utility included in the software I can't find it, so cannot figure out what's wrong, and when it is refusing to scan because the ink has run out, again, Canon have developed the software so it is impossible to scan via anything else on my Mac. It is also impossible to refill yourself. In a market full of shoddy plastic ink eaters this must be one of the worst.

comments powered by Disqus