Read our full specifications for the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 specifications

More Photos

A minor evolution of the already-excellent DMC-GF1, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 doesn't feel like a revelation and isn't worth the expense for existing GF1 owners. But with great DSLR-level image quality, interchangeable lenses and compact dimensions on the score card, GF-series newbies can't go far wrong here. Though the aim here with the GF2 was to fashion a compact system camera that was both easier to use and swifter than its predecessor, that aim has only been partly realised. The use of controls both physical and touch screen based does make for faster access to key functions once you've got to grips with how the two entities work together, but requires a bit of inquisitive button pressing in the short term. In the final analysis, while the GF2 is an excellent camera in its own right, it doesn't feel as revolutionary as Panasonic's first attempt in the GF1. But if it draws a wider audience to Micro Four Thirds and its inherent benefits - smaller bodies and smaller lenses, yet results comparable (if not an exact match for) the DSLR 'big boys', then we're all for it. Read full review

Overall

9/10

Write your own review

By Gavin Stoker
Reviewed 03 January 2011
Updated 19 May 2011

Price as reviewed

£456.99

$400 Buy now

	$400	Buy now

compare more prices

Key Features

12.1-megapixel sensor
3-inch LCD
Built-in flash
Largely metal build
Buy now for 0

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 specifications
Quick Glance
Camera type	Digital SLR, Mirrorless Camera
Optical Zoom	12
Megapixels	12.1
Physical Specifications
Dimensions Width	112.8
Depth	67.8
Weight (body only)	265g body only
Features
Camera type	Digital SLR, Mirrorless Camera
Optical Zoom	12
Megapixels	12.1
Image Sensor	17.3x13mm Live Mos sensor
Optical focal length	Dependent on lens in use
Viewfinder	N/A
Shutter speed	1/4000-60
Auto focus	Contrast AF system (Face Detection, AF tracking, 23 area focusing, 1 area focusing, touch)
Manual focus	Yes
Video (max res/format)	1920x1080 at 30fps, with stereo sound
Max output resolution	4000x3000
Other resolutions	2816x2112, 2048x1536, 1600x1200 in 4:3 aspect ratio
Focus range	Dependent on lens in use
Exposure control	P, A, S, M
Exposure metering	Intelligent, Multiple Centre weighted and Spot
Exposure compensation	1/3 EV steps, +/- 3EV
Image Stabilisation	Optical
ISO settings	Auto, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400
LCD Monitor	3-inch, 460k dot resolution fixed LCD
Flash range	20cm to 4.8m with 14mm lens, 1m to 3.4m with 14-42mm lens
Flash modes	Auto, Auto/Red eye reduction, Forced on, Forced on/Red eye reduction, Slow sync, Slow sync/Red eye reduction, Forced off
White balance modes	Auto, daylight, cloudy, shade, incandescent light, flash, 3 custom settings
Drive modes	Single, continuous
Image formats	Raw, JPEG
Picture adjustments	Colour, Black & White, contrast, sharpness, saturation, noise reduction
Movie length	Up to 140 minutes
Self timer	2, 10 secs
Memory card slot	SD/SDHC/SDXC
Supplied memory	N/A
Batteries supplied	Lithium ion pack
Charger supplied	Yes
A/V output	HDMI
USB	USB 2.0
HDMI	Yes
Manual	Basic printed guide, full manual on CD

	$400	Buy now

Awards

Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 details

Image Quality: 8/10
Value: 8/10
Overall: 9/10

Pros & Cons

Pros

DSLR-quality images
Interchangeable lenses
Full-HD 1080p video capture
DSLR-quality images
DSLR-quality images

Cons

3D shots are low-res
Not worth upgrading over the GF1

Manufacturer

Panasonic

Comments

Please wait while we process your request

Please wait while we retrieve the user's information

Bio

Your bio is currently empty. Now is a great time to fill in your profile.

This profile is private.

This profile is only shared with friends.

This profile is under review.

We were unable to request friendship with this user.

We were unable to request friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

Your friendship request has been sent to this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user.

We were unable to terminate friendship with this user. Are you logged in?

You are no longer friends with this user.

We were unable to ignore this user.

We were unable to ignore this user. Are you logged in?

This user is now ignored.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user.

We were unable to stop ignoring this user. Are you logged in?

This user is no longer ignored.

pluck_user_mp-abuse_too_long_err

12 comments

Sort:

Name withheld

SpiderJacek

8:17 AM on 3 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore SpiderJacek. Show Details Hide Details

Design score means Build score and Performance means Image Quality? :)

Score:

haim

8:47 AM on 3 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore haim. Show Details Hide Details

I bought the GF1 about 6 months ago, so was kinda relieved (in a sad selfish sort of way) when the GF2 turned out to be more a re-focusing of the camera rather than an upgrade.

I know next to nothing about this stuff but have read a number of people were disappointed with the change to the new prime lens (pancake) as the 20mm that came with the GF1 was well regarded and the new supposedly somewhat of a step down in quality.

Mircea

9:20 AM on 3 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Mircea. Show Details Hide Details

Great review, but no full resolution samples? Also, we need crops to check out the ISO performance.

RayHopper

10:19 AM on 3 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore RayHopper. Show Details Hide Details

Thanks for the review, Gavin. As I asked your predecessor on several occasions, PLEASE tell us about the shutter noise on mirrorless cameras - they really should be completely silent by now. The Samsung NX100 is the quietest I've handled so far, whilst the Sony NEX's are the noisiest. I shan't upgrade my Canon G11 until near-silent shutters are available.

Peter

6:12 PM on 3 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Peter. Show Details Hide Details

Does the 3d effect get reduced because the camera sensors are much closer together than a normal pair of eyes?

piesforyou

6:34 PM on 3 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore piesforyou. Show Details Hide Details

@Ray

Just curiosity - what's the problem with shutter noise?

atomsmasher

12:44 AM on 4 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore atomsmasher. Show Details Hide Details

Gavin, great review. Full resolution crops in the review or links to the original jpeg files would be very helpful when evaluating image quality. Which lens was used for the test photos? Cheers

Cliff

9:10 PM on 4 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Cliff. Show Details Hide Details

Thanks for the comments. We have added an image quality score, and full res images will be in future reviews, which are being written as I type.

Voldenuit

6:31 AM on 5 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Voldenuit. Show Details Hide Details

Pretty spot-on assessment, although I think TR was a bit lenient with the final score.

The most egregious omission compared to the GF1 is the loss of the AEL button, making focus/exposure lock more of a chore than it needs to be. This is especially important in m43 with its limited dynamic range and tendency to clip highlights.

Another negative point is that the bundled 14/2.5 lens is fairly average, whereas the 20/1.7 was good enough reason to get the GF1 just for the lens.

But nitpicking aside, I do agree that m43 is still a credible alternative (though not necessarily replacement) to APS-C DSLRs. The portability alone is a great reason to get the system, and it still boasts a larger lens selection than, say, NEX. Also, the NEX, while theoretically able to drive some Alpha mount lenses (with adapter), is very slow to focus when doing so (slower than, say, the GF2 with most 4/3 lenses).

If you're shooting in low light, though, you probably want a Pentax K-5 or Nikon D7000.

Matt G Baish

8:03 AM on 5 January, 2011

This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore Matt G Baish. Show Details Hide Details

@Ray Hopper

When I recently tried out the Sony NEX-3D my local Sony Centre I was amazed as how the shutter noise took me back to the days of `proper` cameras - for me it isn't a problem &, in fact, would be a desirable `feature`:)

Please wait while we file your abuse report.

We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.

We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.

Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.