This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore OrlandoRealtor.Show DetailsHide Details
Don't understand how you could give the D60 so low marks. The camera is an advancement over the D40X which was rated a 10, and has more features. Sure it doesn't have live view but that is not perfected yet. As far as taking pictures, it's quality is up there with the best. Think you should re-evaluate your review. Featuers should at least be an 8 and Value a 9 as the price is really good now.
I agree with the previous comment. This review seems very negative compared to the review for the D40x, which is now retailing for over £100 more on Amazon.co.uk. The D60 is selling for £390, which seems good to me, and unless there is evidence that the features and image quality have deteriorated compared to the D40/D40x, then surely it should also get top marks?
This comment is hidden because you have chosen to ignore SabyasachiBose.Show DetailsHide Details
In bright lighting condition (like, in a bright cloudy day) the back LCD panel of D60 doesn't show up any info (remains black) even if the '+' button is pressed. It may be a defect of the model. Can any body suggest anything?
I totally agree with the marks given for this camera - and therefore disagree with the commments made about. To have no live view and no in-built image stabilisation surely must detract from the cameras funtunality within this price sector. As a first time buyer of a D-SLR, you are directed to the Nikons and Canons - to find these features lacking is quite disappointing. While these may not be important to experienced photographers, to beginners like me they are important.
Layby .. I think if you read the article above, they state that Nikon doesn't put image stabilization in their cameras. They put them in the lens. At least that's the way it reads. So the D40 doesn't have it either.
Also, honestly how can any camera (D40x) receive so many 10's. Leave some wiggle room. GG
This is about the 10th review I have read about the Nikon D60. This is the only one to give a poor rating, very puzzling. I am now in doubt about making a purchase.To be rated lower than the D40 and D40x seems to suggest that Nikon are taking a step back, surely a first for them.
I just bought the d60 with the vibration reduction lenses and my first test out of the box was to take a picture of the stamen of a flower backlit by strong sunlight - I figured this was an extreme test - I used the spot focus and spot metering - in other words, just 2 extra steps beyond a point and shoot, and the result was fantastic - really nice depth of field, sharp auto focus in low light (the flower was in shadow), exposure was nearly perfect - the stamen itself was in sharp focus, some of the pollen particles were not - but this was with the 18-55 mm lens and no tripod. Those of us who are graduating up from a film - based SLR don't mind having to look through a viewfinder. I thought I would need to spend hours learning the features of this camera to be able to take nice pictures, but I was pleasantly surprised at how intuitive everything is. If you are used to using old SLRs, this model is a dream come true.
I disagree with the score as well. I got mine a few days ago and I love it. I sold my new Olympus E510 as I did not like it at all, I hated the strobing flash. Photos with the D60 are fresh and clear and razor sharp. It is a breeze to use. True the lenses are more expensive but something to save for I guess. I would give this a 9 out of 10.
I cannot comprehend how you have come up with these scores. Give this camera to Cliff Smith for a second opinion. The D60 may not have a 3in screen or Liveview, but these features are extraneous and only detract from the most idea of a DSLR (Digital Single Lens Reflex - ie you are MEANT TO look through the lens, not at a screen). Not having an AF-Drive motor, this is an non issue as this camera is designed for beginners (ie having no legacy issues) and AF-S being slower than so called dual systems (AF-S runs independently on my D300 that has a screwdriver unit), the 'kit' af-s lenses on a D60 still zip along faster than my AF-D lenses on my D300. Not having enough AF points? Can I ask how many do you really use? Centre and Right and then there is always focus and reframe. These are only my comments to address the 'faults' that have been highlighted, this article is worth less than the webspace that it resides on, telling us that the batter is a 'new long life rechargeable Lithium Ion battery' it is the SAME EN-EL9 that is found in the Nikon D40 and D40x, also can you please explain these 'dual systems' that run faster than the lens mounted AF?
To top it off, I cannot see the reasoning for the low scores that you have given this camera. Especially for Value and Image Quality.
For the record I HAVE USED THIS CAMERA and the D40x, and have found the D60 to be an improvement.
PS: For the moderator, if you disagree with this comment then feel free to ignore the anomaly in the review quality. I deplore you to let someone who actually knows a little more about the camera technology to write reviews on DSLRs in future. If you want a full list of anomalies in this review then feel free to contact me and I'll happily compile a list for you.
My girlfriend bought a D60 in January for £290 if you include the Nikon cash back offer. I already own a Canon EOS450 so it has been interesting to make the comparisons. Initially we were disappointed with the pictures which were taken on the automatic settings. The colours seemed to lack punch and seemed flat in comparison the Canon. After altering the settings and increasing colour saturation there was a noticeable improvement although still not quite as good as the Canon. However, we have been particularly impressed with internal shots take ISO800. Here the camera outperforms the Canon with more detail and better colour reproduction. In general the camera is light and easy to use and the lens that Nikon provide is certainly better than the standard lens offered on both the Canon EOS450 and ESO1000. For a beginners camera not a bad choice particularly as it is getting cheaper. However, I will go back to my old mantra – these basic level SLR’s still don’t produce the standard of prints that I can get from my Nikon F55 (that only cost me £130 new!).
We're sorry. We were unable to report abuse at this time.
We limit the number of reactions an individual user can submit over a given period for quality reasons. You have currently reached that limit. Please try resubmitting your abuse report again later.
Comment is too long. Enter 500 characters or less.
Comments
User reviews
There are currently no reviews for this product.
Read more reviews >
To add your own review log in or sign up