large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Sony Xperia L Review - Battery Life and Verdict Review


Sony Xperia L – Battery Life and Connectivity

The Sony Xperia L’s battery is a moderate performer. Its 1,750mAh Lithium-Ion capacity is enough for a full day’s use but little more, which is marginally better than on the rival Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini and similar to the larger Google Nexus 4.

Some puzzling Wi-Fi issues don’t help the battery life, however. Wi-Fi on the Sony Xperia L is extremely sluggish to set up and flaky. It took roughly five minutes to lock on to a network used by many test devices before it, and it regularly dropped connections.

These constant attempts to lock on, and reconnect to, a network can be a severe drain on the handset’s battery reserves. Moreover, the Wi-Fi woes caused us to repeatedly hit our daily data limits early in the day because the phone kept on reverting to 3G without warning.

Elsewhere the Sony Xperia L connectivity options are strong but less than ground-breaking. There’s no HDMI connection, but the customary audio jack and microUSB ports are conveniently positioned. The inclusion of NFC future proofs the phone, but will be little use to many at launch.

Sony Xperia L

Sony Xperia L – Call Quality

The Sony Xperia L comes up just sort on call quality expectations. Calls, both made and received, are somewhat muffled and lack the clarity and defined tones you would expect of a £250 phone. While signal strength is strong, leaving us with no concerns about dropped calls, the level of distortion introduced counteracts any plus points won on this front. The speaker phone is a little better – it’s louder, but the same basic clarity issues remain, resulting in muffled, distant sounding calls.

Sony Xperia L

Should I buy the Sony Xperia L?

No. The Xperia L has a decent screen and performance is adequate, but the camera’s excruciating two-second shutter delay is a major black mark against it, as is the so-so build quality. There are better phones available for the same price.

The most obvious one is the Google Nexus 4. It outstrips the Sony Xperia L on all fronts and, if you are happy taking on the Nexus device on a SIM-free basis, is arguably the only handset to consider in this price bracket. Its only handicap is the lack of a microSD card slot, but the £280 16GB version should have enough space for most people.

If you absolutely must have a memory card slot, consider Motorola Razr i. It’s a few months old now, but it’s an excellent Android alternative at a decent price.


The Sony Xperia L lacks the spit and polish necessary to standout at this price. The basics are good enough, but the sluggish camera and merely ok design count against it.

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 7
  • Camera 5
  • Design 6
  • Usability 7
  • Value 6
  • Features 7
  • Screen Quality 7

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.