- Easy operation
- Noisy AF
- Review Price: £399
This is the most expensive of three Sigma lenses that offer 70-300mm and an f/4-5.6 maximum aperture. For those on a tight budget, the £170 DG version may look appealing but it did not perform well when tested previously by WDC. The £230 Apo DG seems much more worthy of consideration and the version tested here adds image stabilisation to improve usability still further.
The Sigma employs a wide zoom-ring towards the middle of the lens and a forward-positioned manual focusing ring that rotates in AF mode, slightly restricting the grip that can be used when the lens is fully extended. There is a focused-distance scale and depth-of-field markings for the 70mm focal length. The AF/MF switch and the OS Off/On switch are at the rear of the lens.
Sigma’s Optical Stabilizer offers only a single mode but is effective and exceptionally quiet. The AF mechanism is a little noisy but at least it’s quick enough to capture most common subjects.
As is the case for other lenses with a forward-located focus ring, the reversible lens hood prevents manual focusing from being used below about 200mm. In addition, removing or fitting the lens hood makes the lens barrel rotate and this can be both inconvenient and disconcerting.
Sigma warns: ‘when you use the lens in rain or near water, keep it from getting wet,’ adding, ‘it is often impractical to repair the internal mechanism, lens elements and electric components damaged by water’. Use on the beach to photograph surfers during testing passed uneventfully so Sigma’s warning, albeit sensible, should not prevent careful use in a variety of environments.
MTF testing produced good results for the 70mm and 135mm focal-length settings but at 200mm there was an uncharacteristic dip in wide-aperture performance. Also, the lens narrowly failed to hit the critical 0.25 cycles-per-pixel level when set to its maximum focal-length, though this behaviour isn’t unusual for a lens of this type.
Overall, Sigma’s lens performed very well and field testing suggests it loses nothing by offering only single-mode image stabilisation. At some £300 on-the-street, this looks rather a bargain.
Score in detail
Image Quality 8
Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test each product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare things properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.