Verdict
Pros
- Effective optical stabilisation
Cons
- Focusing ring rotates in AF
Key Specifications
- Review Price: £420
Sigma’s lens was tested here using a Canon EOS 40D, on which it focused reasonably quickly (but not remarkably so) and very reliably. Sadly, but not unusually for a lens of this type, the focusing ring rotates and there is no option to apply manual focus adjustments when the lens is set to AF mode.
Although the lens does not have a macro label in its specification, a reproduction scale is unveiled as the lens is zoomed. Maximum magnification is 1:3.4, which gives a 0.29x reproduction ratio. This is par for the course.
The lens has an especially broad zoom ring that moves smoothly and with just the right amount of torque. Its direction of rotation is such that an anti-clockwise movement (from behind the camera) extends the focal length: many superzooms work the opposite way but Sigma’s system feels more natural to me.
There is a certain amount of untidiness in the zoom’s MTF curves. That said, provided that the lens is not used wide-open at a longer focal-length setting, the results are above the crucial 0.25 cycles-per-pixel level right across the zoom range down to f/16. There is also some corner softness, especially wide-open, but chromatic aberrations are minor and unobtrusive.
Sigma often provides a pouch with its lenses but not on this occasion. It is likely that Sigma feels that its 18-250mm zoom will be so frequently used that a pouch would be simply a waste of the buyer’s money.
In terms of handling, the stowed lens-hood gets in the way when short focal-lengths are set, which is also the time when the lens-hood is likely to be most effective. The solution therefore seems obvious: only allow the hood to remain reversed at longer focal-lengths when its effectiveness and obtrusiveness are both reduced. In practice, that may not be convenient and I would simply leave the lens-hood in the box.
More encouragingly, the optical stabilisation system is very quiet and works like a dream. Other aspects of the lens may be relatively unremarkable but its optical stabilisation system provides a compelling reason to choose this lens over its peers.
Sample images
Verdict
Although it is by no means perfect, the built-in optical stabilisation technology and superior image sharpness of the Sigma 18-250mm makie it a strong contender for anyone considering an all-in-one superzoom lens.
Trusted Score
Score in detail
-
Value 9
-
Design 9
-
Image Quality 9
-
Features 9
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
