In terms of presentation, Shadowrun does very little wrong. The overall look and feel is slick and the game setup system works a treat. Visually, it’s not quite in the GRAW2/Gears of War league, but it’s on a par with Rainbow Six: Vegas, Perfect Dark and others, with fine art-design, some fabulous lighting, some fine displacement and particle effects for the magic, and distinctive, well-formed levels. The only major disappointment is the lack of character designs; it would have been nice to have has more than one look per race per team.
Sadly, just as this saga seems headed for a happy ending, we get to the most baffling decision of all. Shadowrun is thoroughly enjoyable, but it just doesn’t feel like a complete package. For £30 or £40 you have a right to expect more than three game modes, 12 maps (three of which are just cut-down variations) and no single-player mode bar six tutorials and a botmatch. What’s more, the big idea Microsoft is pushing with this one – the ability to play against Vista or 360 players regardless of which platform you’re playing on – simply doesn’t hold much water. In the end, do you really care whether your opponent is on a 360 or on a PC? Does it make the game better that some players have auto-aim and some have their reticule fudged to reduce the keyboard/mouse advantage? At the end of the day, don’t you just want enough players to make a decent game?
More worryingly, I can think of at least four games on the 360 – Call of Duty 3, GRAW2, Gears of War and BF2: Modern Combat – that have equally impressive multiplayer modes but come packaged with a more or less brilliant single player game. And that’s before we even start thinking about Prey, F.E.A.R. or the upcoming Half Life 2 and Halo 3. On the PC, Shadowrun has almost too many rivals to mention. With Battlefield 2142, Counter-Strike Source, Half-Life 2 Deathmatch, Call of Duty 2, Prey and Quake 4 to play right now, plus Unreal Tournament 3, Crysis, Quake Wars: Enemy Territory and Team Fortress 2 on the horizon, you have to wonder why Microsoft feel £30 for Shadowrun and £40 for the Live service sounds like a good deal.
It’s a shame. Shadowrun is a unique, compelling and well-balanced online FPS, but it’s one that desperately needs new and – importantly – free content to make it a real ongoing concern. Overall, you can’t help but feel that Microsoft has royally shafted its own game. As a cheap release given away with a Games for Windows Live subscription or as a bargain-priced 2700 point Xbox Live download, most people would have lapped it up. As it is, Shadowrun deserves a bigger audience than it will likely attract.
A fine, superbly balanced FPS that mixes action, magic and Sci-Fi tech with real skill. But why pay £40 for a Vista only multiplayer game when other single-player games throw one just as good in gratis?
Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.