Does the Samsung Galaxy S10 have a good camera?
- The Galaxy S10 has three cameras on the back: a main 12-megapixel with an aperture that shifts between f/1.5 and f/2.4 depending on light. An ultra-wide 16-megapixel unit, and a telephoto 12-megapixel for zooming.
- It’s a fantastic versatile camera system that takes great pictures and offers plenty of control with various modes and settings.
- It’s an improvement over the S9’s camera, but sits below the Pixel 3 when it comes to low-light shots.
The Galaxy S10’s cameras perform very well overall. The wide, telephoto and ultra-wide cameras offer reliable autofocus, white balance and exposure, with the latter markedly improved over the S9.
The new 16-megapixel ultra-wide camera, which gives you a 12mm equivalent focal length, is a particularly handy new addition for shooting buildings and skylines, or scenes with large groups of people. However, its heavy barrel distortion means that it’s really only one for occasional use.
Samsung has given the main 12-megapixel camera, with variable f/1.5-f/2.4, some subtle software improvements that lift it slightly above the Galaxy S9, if not rivals such as the Google Pixel 3 and Huawei Mate 20 Pro.
Fenchurch St: Samsung Galaxy S10 (left), Apple iPhone XS (right) – move slider to compare
The Galaxy S10’s HDR performance (left) is an improvement over the S9, pulling out lots of detail in high-contrast scenes such as this. But its scene optimiser mode can make glass buildings look sky blue, and it can still crush darker areas – unlike the shot from iPhone XS (right). The latter manages to reveal greater detail in the shadows on the right and is more balanced, if less punchy, than the S10.
Barbican: Samsung Galaxy S10 (left) vs Apple iPhone XS (right) – move slider to compare
On first inspection there isn’t much between these shots of the Barbican from the S10 (left) and iPhone XS (right). In good light, the S10 does push the iPhone close for detail and exposure. However, look more closely still and you’ll see that the S10’s more heavy-handed noise reduction and sharpening has resulted in loss of detail, making the flowers look a little over-processed. Still, the HDR performance is an improvement on the same shot taken with the S9, which blew out some of the highlights and created an overly contrasted look.
Leadenhall Market: Samsung Galaxy S10 (left) vs Samsung Galaxy S9 (right) – move slider to compare
This shot shows the slight improvements in the Galaxy S10’s exposure and HDR modes, compared to its predecessor. On the right, the Galaxy S9 has completely blown out the sky and lost slightly more detail in the dark areas. Still, aside from the sky, there isn’t a vast difference between the two shots, and it’s fair to say the S10’s camera setup is more of an incremental upgrade than a big leap forward.
City of London bollard: Samsung Galaxy S10 (left) vs Samsung Galaxy S9 (right) – move slider to compare
The Galaxy S10’s main camera (left) is just that little bit more reliable than the S9’s in most lighting conditions. Here, the S9 (right) has overexposed the shot, making the pavement look washed-out and losing some of the detail on the City of London bollard. If anything, the S10 has veered towards underexposure, but it’s still the better shot with good dynamic range and superior detail.
St Pauls: Samsung Galaxy S10 (left) vs Samsung Galaxy S9 (right) – move slider to compare
The S10’s white balance has veered towards a bluer night sky rather than the browner tint seen on the S9, even if the latter’s was technically a more realistic representation of London’s light pollution. Overall, though, the S10’s shot wins here – it’s better exposed, with fewer blown-out areas than the S9, and noise is well controlled without any real loss of detail.
Barbican hallway: Samsung Galaxy S10 (left) vs Apple iPhone XS (right) – move slider to compare
While the S10 has improved HDR performance, this shot shows it can still lag behind the iPhone’s Smart HDR in low-light situations. This dimly lit Barbican hallway is a tough test for any camera and the S10 (left) does pretty well at it, but not quite as well as the iPhone.