large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Samsung Galaxy A5 Review - Camera Review

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) – Camera

Mid-range phones tend to fall down as a result of their disappointing cameras, usually because of mediocre software and slow image processing. Thankfully, in the main, the Galaxy A5 steers clear of these pitfalls.

The rear-facing 16-megapixel camera is reliable, capturing detailed shots with good colour accuracy and without the need to faff around with confusing modes. Focusing is fast and accurate, and the clean app makes the shooting process pain-free.

The lack of OIS is a shame – especially since it graced the 2016 model – and there’s no phase detection autofocus either, but start shooting in sunny conditions and you’ll be happy with the results. There’s good depth to shots and enabling the HDR mode makes this even more obvious.

pic1Detail is pleasant in lit shots

pic2There’s a nice depth to photos

pic3The wide f/1.9 aperture gives a nice foreground focus

pic4Low-light shots are better than most in this price-range

pic5There a good balance of colour even when the light isn’t perfect

The f/1.9 aperture is suitably wide, not only helping to capture some decent bokeh effects, but helping low-light performance too. As with any phone – bar the iPhone 7, Google Pixel and Galaxy S7 – your shots will suffer when lighting conditions are poor, but the Galaxy A5 does manage to capture a decent nightclub shot thanks to its fairly fast shutter speed and focusing.

The front-facing camera matches the rear for basic specs, with a 16-megapixel sensor and f/1.9 aperture. There’s no autofocus, and general focusing is surprisingly slow, but selfies are super-sharp.

Video tops out at 1080p 30fps – so no 4K recording – and the results are a mixed bag. Jerkiness is common due to the lack of OIS, and the sound seems particularly terrible – but it’s fine for basic needs.

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.