Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Ricoh CX3 Review

Verdict

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Pros

  • Impeccable build quality
  • Very fast
  • Very fast

Cons

  • Low quality 3200 ISO setting
  • No manual exposure controls
  • Occasional over-exposure

Key Specifications

  • Review Price: ÂŁ299.99
  • 10.6 megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor
  • 720p HD video recording
  • 10.7x wide-angle zoom lens
  • 3-inch 920k monitor
  • 206g

I’ve always been used to Ricoh launching about one new camera a year, but over the past 12 months the company has gone into overdrive, launching the CX1, then upgrading the lens to launch the CX2 last September. Now just six months later we have the new CX3, which is going on sale here in the UK early next month. I was very impressed with both the CX1 and the CX2, so I was very pleased to get my hands on a full production sample before it hits the stores. I’ve been trying it out for the past couple of weeks, and I have to say the CX series just keeps getting better and better.


The CX3 is again an incremental upgrade of the previous model, but as before the changes are far from insignificant. While it has the same all-metal body, high quality 10.7x wide-angle zoom lens and ultra-sharp three-inch 920k monitor as the CX2, it adds the must-have 720p HD video recording, and more importantly it is one of the first compact cameras to feature the latest in digital imaging technology, a 10.6 megapixel back-illuminated CMOS sensor.
Ricoh CX3 digital camera front view with lens extended.

The long-zoom compact market is a highly competitive one, and the CX3 has a couple of serious rivals, the most notable of course being the multi-award-winning Panasonic TZ7 and its replacement the impressive-looking new TZ10 which I’ll be reviewing later this week. The TZ7 is currently selling for around ÂŁ260 and the TZ10 will likely be priced at around ÂŁ280-ÂŁ300 when it goes on sale next month. Also competing for the same customers and due for imminent replacement is the Canon SX200 IS (ÂŁ215). Its successor will be the SX210 IS which also goes on sale next month priced at a hefty ÂŁ359. Compared to these the CX3’s launch price of ÂŁ299.99 doesn’t seem too expensive.

The CX3 is outwardly identical to the CX2, and as with previous Ricoh cameras the build quality is impeccable. It’s not a particularly small camera, measuring 101.5 x 58.3 x 29.4mm and weighing 206g including battery and card, but is roughly the same size and weight as the new Panasonic TZ10. It has excellent handling thanks to a textured plastic handgrip on the front and a shaped thumb rest on the back. It shares the same quick and easy to use control interface as the CX2, and thanks to the incredibly high resolution wide-view monitor (double the resolution of most DSLR screens) the menu is extremely sharp and easy to read. It also has the same on-screen camera level indicator, so there’s no excuse for tilted horizons.
Ricoh CX3 camera displaying its menu settings on the LCD screen.

The CX3’s new CMOS sensor is of a new type that has a couple of major advantages. Traditionally digital imaging sensor chips have been made like any other computer chip. They are constructed on a silicon wafer with the photocells embedded in it, and then connected with microscopic wires on the surface of the wafer. This works well, but it does mean that the wires partially obscure the light-sensitive photocells, reducing the efficiency of the sensor especially in low light situations. Back-illuminated sensors such as the one in the CX3 are effectively made upside down, so that the wires connect to the photocells from underneath, allowing the sensor to capture more light, which should give it better low light performance, dynamic range and colour depth.


As well as its new high-tech sensor the CX3 features 1280 x 720 HD video recording, a feature that many users were surprised to see omitted from the specification of the CX2. Video is recorded at 30fps and the audio quality is surprisingly good compared to most other compact cameras, but it is only monaural and as usual the optical zoom cannot be adjusted while recording. Digital zoom up to 2.8x is available.
Ricoh CX3 digital camera viewed from side angles.

Unlike its soon-to-be arch rival the Panasonic TZ10 the CX3 has no manual exposure controls, but it does have a useful selection of scene modes, including a nice high-contrast monochrome mode, a skew correction mode that automatically adjusts the angle of shots of documents, whiteboards or slideshows, and the clever “Miniaturize” mode seen on the CX2, which mimics the limited depth effects of macro photography. There is also a discreet mode which disables the flash, AF lamp and all sounds, and is sure to be popular on Japanese commuter trains. The CX3 also has the in-camera HDR mode, or “Dynamic Range Double Shot” as seen on the CX2.

The CX2 had excellent overall performance, but the CX3 is even faster. It starts up in a little under 2.5 seconds, and in single-shot mode at maximum quality it has a shot-to-shot time of approximately 1.4 seconds. However it is in continuous shooting mode that it really excels. The CX3 can shoot at five frames a second at full 10 megapixel resolution, 30fps at 2MP resolution, or at 60fps or 120fps at 640 x 480 resolution.
Ricoh CX3 compact digital camera with lens extended.

The nine-point autofocus system is the same as the CX2, and so unsurprisingly is still extremely fast and accurate, and works fairly well in low light, with an AF assist lamp that has a range of about three metres. The flash however has been upgraded and is now even more powerful and has an even faster recycle time of approximately 4.8 seconds from a full power flash. The battery powering all this goodness is also slightly more powerful, 950mAh instead of 940.


I have to admit I was expecting the new sensor to produce a bigger improvement in overall image quality. The CX2 certainly suffered no major problems in this department, but the CX3 is really not very much better. The overall level of detail is among the best of the 10MP compacts, colour rendition is as good as ever, white balance is accurate and exposure is generally good, although there were some occasional over-exposures. There is a slight improvement in corner sharpness, possibly due to an improved anti-distortion algorithm, and dynamic range in non-HDR mode does appear to be slightly broader producing more shadow detail, however high ISO noise is pretty much exactly the same, with good image quality up to 400 ISO and then steady loss of detail from 800 upwards. The new maximum 3200 ISO setting is very low quality and should really be avoided.
Ricoh CX3 camera with SD card slot open.

So is the CX3 enough of an improvement over the CX2 to justify upgrading? Probably not, to be honest, but if you’re looking for a versatile well made long-zoom compact with outstanding performance, great handling and a range of advanced features and useful functions, as well as good image quality, then it’s one of the best options available.


”’Verdict”’

The Ricoh CX3 is only a minor upgrade of the CX2, but the improved performance, HD video recording and marginally better image quality ensure that it can still compete with its more popular rivals. Build quality, handling and ease of use are all excellent, performance is fantastic and picture quality is up there with the best.

”Over the next few pages we show a range of test shots. On this page the full size image at the minimum and maximum ISO settings have been reduced to let you see the full image, and a series of full resolution crops have taken from original images at a range of ISO settings to show the overall image quality. These pictures were taken indoors using shaded natural light. ”


—-
Two model cars, a red Jaguar E-Type and a green classic convertible.


This is the full frame at 80 ISO.


—-
Close-up of a red and green vintage car hoods and headlights.


At the minimum ISO setting the image quality is excellent.


—-
Close-up of vintage cars reflecting on shiny surface.


Image quality is still very high at 100 ISO.


—-
Close-up of a red car's glossy curved surface with reflections.


There is a trace of noise at200 ISO but overall quality is still very good.


—-
Close-up of classic red and green cars with chrome details.


Noise reduction is starting to to creep in at 400 ISO, but the image is still usable.


—-
Red vintage car and black scooter parked indoors.


Quality is much reduced at 800 ISO.


—-
Close-up photo of a red car's damaged side mirror.


Noise is very visible at 1600 ISO, and colour saturation and smoothness is severely compromised.


—-

Close-up of a camera lens with visible dust particles.


3200 ISO is pretty terrible and should be avoidedTwo diecast model cars on a display stand..


This is the full frame at 3200 ISO.


—-

”A range of general test shots are shown over the next two pages. In some cases, the full size image has been reduced for bandwidth purposes, and a crop taken from the original full resolution image has been placed below it to show the overall image quality. Some other pictures may be clicked to view the original full-size image. ”


—-

Intricate cathedral window with scaffolding on the left side


Here’s the usual detail test shot of the West Window of Exeter Cathedral, for you to compare with other cameras. See below for a full res crop, or click to see the whole picture.


—-
Detailed architectural stone tracery with intricate patterns.


The overall level of detail is superb, but not that much better than the CX2.


—-
Decorative concrete block wall captured by Ricoh CX3 camera.


It looks like the CX3 has a new anti-distortion algorithm.


—-
Photo captured by Ricoh CX3 through a patterned iron gate.


Centre sharpness is excellent.


—-
Close-up photo of a bird perched in a stone lattice.


Corner sharpness is also much improved, with almost no chromatic aberration.


—-

”Here are some general test shots to help evaluate the camera’s overall image quality, including dynamic range, colour rendition and the zoom range of the lens. Some pictures may be clicked to download the full size original image. ”


—-
Photo taken with Ricoh CX3 showcasing street and architecture clarity.


The wide-angle end is equivalent to 28mm, but this shot is over-exposed.


—-
Photograph of a building rooftop captured with Ricoh CX3 camera.


The telephoto end is equivalent to 300mm.


—-
Photo taken with Ricoh CX3 camera showing a historic alleyway.


With the in-camera HDR turned off the dynamic range is a little better than average for a 10MP compact.


—-
Photo taken with Ricoh CX3 of a cobblestone alleyway leading to a cathedral.


The same shot with HDR on shows much more shadow and highlight detail.


—-
Close-up of moss and grass taken with Ricoh CX3 camera.


Like many Ricoh cameras the CX3 has a 1cm macro range.


—-
Snowy landscape with trees along a narrow river.


The very precise zoom control and on-screen level display allows shots to be framed perfectly.


—-
Snow-covered park captured with Ricoh CX3 camera.


The HDR setting works well for snow scenes too.


—-

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Value 8
  • Image Quality 9
  • Build Quality 9

Features

Camera type Super Zoom
Megapixels (Megapixel) 10.6 Megapixel
Optical Zoom (Times) 10.7x

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Trusted Reviews Logo

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Trusted Reviews delivered right to your inbox.

This is a test error message with some extra words