large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Panasonic TX-32AS500 Review - Sound and Conclusions Review


Panasonic TX-32AS500: Sound Quality

The suspicion with any TV nearly as slim as the 32AS500 is that it won’t leave enough room for any decent speakers. However, while the 32AS500 doesn’t do anything particularly good sonically nor is it demonstrably poorer than some chunkier sets in town. Voices sound clear if a touch hissy, treble detail levels are high without sounding excessively harsh (at sensible volumes anyway), and the mid-range is just about open enough to avoid sounding muddy during action scenes.

Panasonic 32AS500Bass is pretty limited, but this is only to be expected really, and at least the set doesn’t try to put in more bass than it’s really capable of producing – a common budget TV practice that leads to nasty distortions and ‘phutting’ effects.

Other points to consider

While the 32AS500 doesn’t ship with a second remote like some smart TVs, you can control it if you wish via Panasonic’s nicely designed new Viera remote control app for Android and iOS.

When it comes to gaming concerns, it’s great to find this screen measuring only 33ms of input lag, a figure low enough to mean the time it takes the screen to produce its pictures will have negligible impact on your gaming abilities.

Should I buy a Panasonic TX-32AS500?

If you like the look of My Home Screen and its personalisable interface, then the 32AS500 is worth a punt at £300. Especially as its pictures look decent enough with bright, ‘daytime’ footage of the sort that may make up much of its usage time in a second-room environment. 

However, a lack of contrast means the set struggles as a movie display, and as a likely second-room screen it’s a shame the catch up services on offer are more limited than those available from most rival brands this year.


The 32AS500 looks the part and its good to see Panasonic getting involved with some truly aggressive pricing this year. The set passes muster as a ‘casual’ daytime TV screen with its picture quality too. But a lack of contrast hurts its appeal to more discerning movie lovers and its TV catchup services are disappointing even for the price.

We test every TV we review thoroughly over an extended period of time. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as the main TV for the review period

Tested for more than a week

Tested using industry calibrated tools, discs and with real world use

Tested with broadcast content (HD/SD), video streams and demo discs

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Value 8
  • Smart TV 8
  • Image Quality 7
  • Design 8
  • Sound Quality 6

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.