Panasonic Lumix GH3 Review - Image Quality Summary and Verdict Review


Panasonic Lumix GH3: Image Quality

Overall image quality produced by the GH3 is very, very good. The
144-zone metering system copes admirably with tricky high-contrast
scenes. The GH3 offers exposure compensation between -5EV and 5EV,
however while out test shooting with our review sample we rarely had to
use this feature, and even when we did we never had to dial in more than

Lumix GH3 sample image 1
1/80sec @ f/14, ISO 125, 14mm

Using daylight-balanced lamps and a Datacolor Spyder
Checkr chart we were able to ascertain how well the GH3 renders colour
and white balance. Results between ISO 125 and 1600 were vibrant, punchy
and rich in colour as might be expected. Better still, there was no
sign of the saturation decreasing as we ramped up the sensitivity, at
least until we reached ISO 25,600 where colours became slightly more
muted compared to ISO 12,800.

Lumix GH3 sample image 1
1/4000sec @ f/8, ISO 6400, 128mm

Controlled resolution tests
undertaken with our standard resolution test chart reveal that the GH3’s
16MP sensor is capable of rendering 32 lines per millimetre at ISO 100
when coupled with the 45mm f/2.8 Macro Leica D Vario-Elmarit lens. While
this is certainly very impressive for a Micro Four Thirds sensor, APS-C
sensors have scored slightly higher in the past. That’s not to take
anything away from the GH3 though, which compared in isolation – or
indeed against other cameras using MFT sensors – performs very well
Panasonic Lumix GH3 5
is very well controlled between ISO 125 and ISO 800, with the GH3
producing clean, finely detailed images, however some noise does begin
to creep in at ISO 1600. At ISO 1600 and 3200 images are certainly
usable, although if you plan on printing your images at 100% then be
aware that noise may well be visible to the naked eye. Beyond ISO 6400
and noise starts to noticeably degrade image quality, with the top
settings of so ISO 12,800 and 25,600 best avoided if possible, or at
least used only in emergencies.

Comparing an unprocessed Raw
file to a processed JPEG revealed a number of subtle differences. JPEG
files tend to be slightly brighter in dark shadowed areas, whereas Raw
files resolve more detail in the highlights. Side by side we also
noticed that JPEG files have fractionally more contrast applied, while
in-camera sharpening was clearly obvious in JPEG files.


Panasonic’s flagship digital single lens mirrorless (DSLM) camera (more
commonly referred to as a compact system camera) the Lumix GH3 has come
on a long way from the two-year-old GH2 and brings with it a generous
range of improvements. Indeed, with its larger hand grip, bigger
battery, superb touchscreen and integrated Wi-Fi connectivity we don’t
have any hesitation in saying the GH3 is one of the most intuitive CSCs
we’ve used. It’s also well supported by a broad range of dedicated
G-series lenses, with no fewer than 17 fixed focal lengths and zooms to
choose from. Image quality is very good too, and while resolution of
fine detail isn’t quite up there with the best APS-C equipped cameras,
the GH3 nonetheless performs solidly enough to take on the DSLR
competition with conviction.

Trusted Score

Score in detail

  • Value 8
  • Design & Features 9
  • Image Quality 8
  • Build Quality 8

Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.