large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Olympus 17mm f/2.8 Review

Verdict

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Pros

  • Ultra wide-angle view

Cons

  • Very high price

Key Specifications

  • Review Price: £290
Olympus_17mm_angle-of-view.JPG

 

As the first Olympus lens for the Micro Four Thirds system, the 17mm f/2.8 can be viewed has having defined the standard for prime lenses. It is also, potentially, a competitor to Panasonic’s similarly-priced Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 lens, which has almost the same breadth of view but benefits from a faster maximum aperture.

Like the Lumix 20mm, Olympus’s 17mm is a pancake design that hugs the front of the camera and protrudes no more than about 25mm from the flange. The only control is a manual-focus ring, which drives the focusing mechanism electronically: the sound is rather more energetic than that from the Lumix but Olympus’s lens is quicker to achieve sharp focus.

Its smaller maximum aperture means that the Olympus lens also has a reduced front element and a correspondingly small lens cap that verges on being fiddly to fit. The moving part of the lens, which extends and retracts very slightly during focusing, looks a little flimsy but that may be an unjustified concern.

 

MTF_Zuiko_17mm_-_redone1.jpg

One of the great things about the pancake design is the fact that it does not intrude into the illumination area of the pop-up flashgun. In fact (and despite the fact that this is a lens review rather than a camera test) it is worth noting that the Panasonic G1 body used for this evaluation produced very good flash exposures when the 17mm lens was used.

The MTF chart shows that optimal resolution (above 0.25 cycles-per-pixel) is maintained from wide-open to just beyond f/8: this is a reasonable performance but it is nothing to write home about and when fully closed-down the lens records just 0.15 cycles-per-pixel.

Overall this is a good lens but it doesn’t shine brightly. It wins over the Lumix G 20mm in having a slightly wider angle but it loses out in MTF testing and it might be usurped by a similarly-priced zoom that sacrifices a little in the aperture stakes for greater versatility. Of course the zoom would be much more bulky and if a truly compact combination is needed then the Olympus 17mm is always going to hold some appeal.

 

Taken From; www.whatdigitalcamera.com/equipment/reviews/lenses/editors-choice/128119/1/micro-four-thirds-lens-test.html

Sample images

Verdict

This is a slightly disappointing curve but the results are impressive across the most-used apertures given the wide angle-of-view offered

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Value 9
  • Design 9
  • Image Quality 10
  • Features 8

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.