Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Nokia Lumia 630 Review - Battery Life, Call Quality and Verdict Review


Nokia Lumia 630 – Battery Life

One of the issues with the Lumia 630’s closest numerical forbear the Lumia 620 was that it had a pretty small battery. Nokia largely solved this issue with the Lumia 520, and it had packed a respectable brick into the Lumia 630 as well.

The phone uses a 1,830mAh battery, which you have easy access to simply by taking the phone’s back off. Capacity doesn’t sound that great at first, but we do need to consider quite how low-res the phone’s screen is. With 480 x 800 resolution, the Lumia 630 only has roughly a third the number of pixels to drive as the Moto G.

Nokia Lumia 630 3

We were able to get at least a day and a half out of the phone, and it holds onto its charge fairly well when not in use. Nokia says you’ll get 600hrs out of the phone in standby – the reality will almost certainly be a bit less, but it does mean your battery won’t drain down much overnight.

The Nokia Lumia 630 also has a battery saver mode, which limits screen brightness and background data in order to conserve battery. It’s pretty effective, but we don’t recommend using it 24/7, just when you need to drag out the last few per cent of battery. Why? Limiting backlight brightness makes the phone’s display tricky to read outdoors.

Nokia Lumia 630 – Speaker and Call Quality

As is common among Nokia phones, the Lumia 630’s call quality is pretty decent. The call speaker offers quite beefy sound, which should help out when you’re taking calls in slightly noisier environments.

The internal loudspeaker isn’t quite so hot, though. Top volume is decent but the sound is a little coarse and bass-light, as you’d probably expect at the price.

The Lumia 630 has a pretty standard speaker setup, with a single mono speaker on the back.

Nokia Lumia 630 4

Nokia Lumia 630 – Connectivity

The Nokia Lumia 630 offers fairly rudimentary connectivity. The main omission is 4G, which is found in the slightly more expensive Lumia 635 if it is a must-have.

Other less useful missing bits include an IR transmitter, used to let a phone work as a universal remote, ac Wi-Fi and NFC. Nokia was once a big supporter of NFC (it featured in the Lumia 620), but even it seems to have conceded that it is not all that useful for most people.

Aside from 4G and a few bells and whistles, the Lumia 630 has just about everything you’d need. There’s GPS, Bluetooth 4.0 and 21Mbps HSPA (about as fast as 3G gets in phones). There’s also an FM radio, which is often missing from phones these days.

Should I buy the Nokia Lumia 630?

Nokia and Microsoft seem to have trouble maintaining a competitive position with their Android rivals. Last year it had a strong budget showing with the Lumia 620 – it hit it out of the park with that phone. The Lumia 520 was a sensible, hugely popular follow-up.

But it hasn’t kept up the pace.

The Lumia 630 doesn’t have quite the same spark. It acts as a showcase of how much Nokia can now leave out of its phones thanks to the new regime of Windows Phone 8.1, but doesn’t really cost much less, and doesn’t add all that much more either. A larger screen is welcome, but while it adds to certain experiences, its spotlight on the low-dpi screen is a real problem – especially if you compare it to Android rivals of the same price.

We don’t demand Moto G-like sharpness, but a blocky display sees the Lumia 630 arrive already well behind the curve.

Display issues twinned with the continuing app issues of Windows Phone mean most tech fans should probably consider an Android alternative. The Moto E, Moto G, EE Kestrel and Alcatel Idol One Touch S offer more for your money.


The Nokia Lumia 630 is a cheery, low cost phone with a better camera than some bargain basement Androids. But its screen resolution is quite poor and the availability and load speed of apps are issues.

Next, read more mobile phone reviews or try our best cheap mobile phones round-up

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 7
  • Camera 7
  • Design 8
  • Battery Life 8
  • Value 7
  • Features 7
  • Software 6
  • Calls & Sound 7
  • Screen Quality 6

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.