Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Netgear R6100 Review - Performance, Value & Verdict Review

Sections

Netgear R6100 – Performance

Negear R6100 acFile transfer speed comparison for 802.11ac at different distancesSo what happens when you clip the heels of 802.11ac WiFi by fitting Fast Ethernet? Something entirely predictable: you restrict maximum performance to that of Fast Ethernet.

As such this makes a mockery of peak performance testing. At our test distances of 2m and 10m line of sight both 802.11ac and 802.11n 5GHz hit 11.xMBps (circa 90Mbps) which is within the margin of error for the limits of Fast Ethernet. Given the R6100’s aged 802.11ac 2.4GHz standard hit just over 10MBps (80Mbps) at these two distances it shows how badly Fast Ethernet restricts these two newer standards.

Where we do finally see some movement is at 15m behind two standing walls. 802.11ac managed 9.69MBps (77.52Mbps) while 802.11n 5GHz and 2.4GHz recorded 6.94MBps (55.52Mbps) and 5.12MBps (40.96Mbps). None of these results is particularly impressive, even for an AC1200 device, and both the 802.11n speeds are slower than what we achieved with the Asus RT-AC52U.

On the upside performance over USB comes in at 11.3MBps – a decent rate for a budget router.

Negear R6100 combinedSo what about Netgear’s theory of simultaneous data transfer from multiple attached devices rather than singular peak performance? It works, to an extent. Over 802.11ac, speed from a connected NAS still managed 11.4MBps (91.2Mbps) while an attached USB drive hit 6.35MBps (50.8Mbps) resulting in a combined speed of 17.75MBps (142Mbps).

This is an improvement, but we’ve still seen budget 802.11ac routers with Gigabit Ethernet achieve double this over 802.11n 5GHz and triple using 802.11ac. So the compromise really doesn’t make sense to us.

NetgearNETGEAR router front view with status indicator lights.

Should I buy the Netgear R6100?

No. Like Asus before it Netgear has crippled a potentially promising budget router by throttling its wireless performance in order to save a few pounds by fitting Fast Ethernet instead of Gigabit Ethernet. It is a lousy decision.

What’s more the R6100 comes in at £78 – £6 more than the similarly restricted Asus RT-AC52U – and you’ll get much greater wireless performance from ISP-supplied 802.11ac routers like the EE Bright Box 2, TalkTalk Super Router and, most notably, the BT Home Hub 5 (typically free with contract).

In fact, you’ll get better performance from the year old 802.11n 5GHz Virgin New Super Hub, which is restricted to 802.11n 5GHz. If that doesn’t force home the message, nothing will.

Verdict

If you’re looking to upgrade your wireless network then you should look elsewhere. This is a dud.

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 3
  • Value 4
  • Features 4
  • Build Quality 6
  • Usability 7
  • Design 5

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.

Trusted Reviews Logo

Sign up to our newsletter

Get the best of Trusted Reviews delivered right to your inbox.

This is a test error message with some extra words