MSI WindPad 100W Review - Battery Life and Verdict Review


When it comes to life away from a socket for the WindPad
100W, we were very worried when we saw the two-cell rating on MSI’s official
specifications page. However, the actual battery unit is a 4,200mAh model which
kept the tablet running for a solid five and a half hours in our looped video
test with wireless radios turned off and screen brightness at 50 percent.
That’s reasonably impressive for a tablet with netbook-like specifications.


Overall then, the Windpad 100W would be a decent enough
Windows tablet if its price undercut rivals and alternatives to make up for its
cheap design, average performance and poor screen. Unfortunately, it doesn’t,
with the standard retail price at the £500 mark, and the cheapest we could find
it for being £470.

That’s a full £70 more than the Apple iPad2, which might not come close on connectivity but will make a markedly
better casual tablet that’s thinner, lighter, faster, better-built, has more
than double the battery life, a far better screen and is just plain sexier.


But what about those who want Flash video, or who need the
extra connectivity and more of a focus on productivity? Well, you might find
that something like the impressive Android-based Asus Eee Pad Transformer is adequate for your needs. It beats the MSI tablet
in all the same areas as the iPad, offers HDMI-out and expandable storage, and
for its lowly £450 price throws in a keyboard dock (extending its battery life
to 16 hours).

That only leaves those who truly need a Windows 7 tablet,
which we would reckon are very few. If a netbook like the classy, £300
NB550d really won’t do you, you don’t want the extra weight of a convertible
like the currently £450 Acer Aspire 1825PTZ and you can’t afford a good Windows 7 tablet like the £999
Asus EP121, it may just about be worth considering MSI’s entrant.  For everyone else, steer clear.



In terms of specifications and connectivity the MSI WindPad
100W actually offers reasonable value. It’s just a pity that it’s all contained
in one of the least attractive tablet chassis we’ve come across, with a look
and feel that’s more reminiscent of a device costing £100 than one that will
set you back nearly half a grand. Since it also shows off its capabilities on
one of the worst screens we’ve seen, there’s little reason to pick this tablet
over alternatives.

Trusted Score

Score in detail

  • Performance 6
  • Value 4
  • Design 5
  • Features 7
  • Battery Life 7

Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.