Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Microsoft Lumia 650 Review - Battery, camera and verdict Review


Microsoft Lumia 650 – Battery


Initially, the Lumia 650’s battery life was outright terrible. During my first week with the phone it would bizarrely dissipate battery life, even when it was in standby mode. Every night I’d leave the Lumia 650 unplugged with its battery at 100%, only to find that it was showing as little as 15% of its charge by the next morning.

Since downloading the latest software update from Microsoft, however, this has improved significantly. Folllowing the update, the nightly discharge rate dropped to between 10-12%. This isn’t anywhere near as good as an Android Marshmallow handset, whose Doze feature means that most handsets running the OS lose as little as 1-3% per night, but it’s far from terrible.Lumia 650

The Lumia 650 also deals with battery-intensive tasks, such as video streaming, pretty well. Watching Netflix with the screen at 50% brightness, the screen lost an average of 14% per hour. Other phones I’ve tested have lost as much as 20% per hour when tasked with the same test.

In general use the battery lasted between a day to a day and a half on a single charge, which is pretty standard. General use entailed listening to music on the way to and from work, regularly checking my email and social media feeds, watching a couple of YouTube videos, taking and making a few calls and a few intermittent sessions on Plague Inc.

Microsoft Lumia 650 – Camera

8-megapixel front, 5-megapixel front

The 2015 Moto G proved that it is possible to include a decent camera on an affordable handset. However, since its release in 2016, no company has come close to matching the Moto G’s photographic prowess on a sub-£200 handset.

This trend continues on the Lumia 650, which has a usable but uninspiring, slightly finicky 8-megapixel rear camera.

The camera feels clunky, and there’s a noticeable, faction-of-a-second delay between pushing the on-screen shutter button and an image being captured. I experienced the exact same issue on the Desire 530, and it’s just as annoying on the Lumia 650.

Images captured on the Lumia 650 also aren’t quite as sharp as those taken on the Moto G. Even moderately blown-up objects appear a little rough around the edges.
Lumia 650The Lumia 650’s camera can take decent photos if you’re patient
Lumia 650But the slow shutter speeds are frustratingLumia 650And it’s manual controls have little effect on picture quality

The delay makes capturing images on the fly, or moving objects, close to impossible – a fact not aided by its hit-and-miss autofocus. It’s a shame, since colour balance levels when shooting in regular light are solid, and if used with care the camera can capture usable images for sharing on social media.

There are also manual controls for key features, such as ISO and white balance, although I found they didn’t work too well and did little to improve picture quality.

The 5-megapixel rear camera isn’t the best on the market, but is more than good enough for taking selfies and Skype video calls – so long as you’re not using the phone in low light.

Related: Best Affordable Smartphones
Lumia 650

Should I buy Microsoft Lumia 650?

There’s plenty to like about the Lumia 650. It offers up a great design that makes it look and feel far more expensive than it actually is, and the OLED screen is one of the best I’ve seen on an affordable smartphone.

While I’m still not convinced that Windows 10 Mobile is great for general consumers, for business users the Lumia 650 ticks all the right boxes.

Were it not for its woefully underpowered Snapdragon 212 processor, this could have been one of the best affordable handsets around. Sadly, though, like the Desire 530, the CPU’s poor performance ruins what would otherwise be a great user experience, with the phone constantly feeling underpowered. Most people would do better to check out Motorola’s stellar Moto G.


A great-looking Windows 10 Mobile smartphone that’s let down by poor performance.

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 4
  • Camera 6
  • Design 8
  • Battery Life 7
  • Value 7
  • Software 6
  • Screen Quality 7

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.