Kyocera Mita claims the printer can achieve speeds of up to 35ppm. Our five-page text document took 20 seconds to complete, which is 15ppm, but the longer, 20-page test took only 50 seconds, which is 24ppm. This is still some way off the claim and even in draft mode, which produces quite a presentable print, the printer still only managed 26ppm.
The printer’s duplex mode is comparatively quick and our 20-side document produced a speed of 14.6ppm. The five-page text and graphics print gave 16.7ppm and the 15 x 10cm photo print completed in 13 seconds. So it’s the usual story – respectable print speed, but overenthusiastic claims.
The quality of the prints produced was good. Text is light, but fully formed and clean, with no signs of spatter. Greyscale graphics are a little mottled, so not quite as smooth as from the Xerox, but the photo test is smoother, and we saw no signs of the micro-banding the Phaser produced.
Kyocera Mita makes great play of the fact that its printers’ photo-conductor drums last the lifetime of its machines. This is mainly due to Kyocera’s background in ceramics. The drums in its printers are so hard they suffer much less wear than rival consumables, so all you’re paying for to run the FS-2020D is toner.
This doesn’t automatically make it a cheaper printer to run, of course, as it depends on the price of the toner cartridge, but in this case it does have low running costs.
The company quotes a cost per page of 0.058p for the FS-2020D, but we think it’s slipped a decimal point. With a cartridge costing around £73 and including 0.7p for paper, as we always do, we get a page cost of £73 / 12,000 + 0.7 = 1.31p ex VAT, or 1.5p with it. This is still 0.27p less than the Xerox Phaser’s page cost, but with the difference in purchase price, you’re looking at over 25,000 printed pages before the two break even and the FS-2020D becomes the cheaper choice.
Kyocera Mita’s new range of mono lasers, the FS-2020D, FS-3920D and FS-4020D each have their own toner cartridges, rather than sharing a common one. Kyocera Mita says this is to make counterfeiting harder, but it also means any business using more than one model will have to hold extra consumables, so there’s no advantage to the customer.
This is a good, medium-range mono laser, which produces good quality text, though only average greys. It’s easier to run than many printers, as it has capacities commensurate with its target market, but it is quite costly to buy. Although running costs are low, it’s not quite as cheap, overall, as its maker might like you to think.
Unlike other sites, we thoroughly test every product we review. We use industry standard tests in order to compare features properly. We’ll always tell you what we find. We never, ever accept money to review a product. Tell us what you think - send your emails to the Editor.