Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

HTC One A9 Review - Camera Review


HTC One A9 – Camera

Cameras have proved problematic for HTC of late. The One M9’s unit fell well below expectations, so there’s a great deal riding on camera featured in the One A9. On paper it has everything it needs to succeed, including RAW support, which it does to a degree,. However, it still falls short of the standards set by the leading brands.

The basic setup sounds promising. You get a 13-megapixel back-illuminated, or BSI, sensor with an f/2.0 aperture lens. It also includes optical image stabilisation, to help shooting in low light.

A9 13The A9 rarely has problems in good light and produces some nicely exposed shots
A9 11Macros and portraits benefit from punchy colours and plenty of detail

In most situations it’s a fine camera. It captures plenty of detail and its native dynamic range is decent, although not outstanding. It’s fast to focus and quick between shots, too. In these respects, it’s everything a modern smartphone camera ought to be.

Below: Two shots taken with HDR using different exposure points
A9 3

There are issues, however. For whatever reason the HDR mode seems strangely subdued. I struggled to achieve good results, producing shots that were barely distinguishable from non-HDR ones. It also lacks auto HDR, a common and particularly useful feature of top-end phones.

A9 5This flower ought to be a deep red but it appears lighter with flecks of magenta

A9 7The camera can’t cope with this bright red flower at all, so the detail is totally destroyed

Colour accuracy is best described as so-so. The One A9 seems to struggle with strong red colours, which can be seen in the images of red roses. In places, they look magenta and the colours are sometimes totally blown out.

A9 21Some low-light shots look great
A9 15This shot is usable, but the sky appears very noisy

A9 19Bright street lights cause serious issues with lens flair

Low light ought to be a strength given the camera’s specs, and the One A9 does produce slightly brighter shots than the iPhone 6S in the same conditions. However, this often comes at the cost of obvious and distracting noise.

The lens also suffers significantly from flair, where bright lights distort. This is annoying if you’re shooting at night, for example, since bright street lamps can ruin practically all of your shots.

Such niggling issues would be tolerable on a genuinely mid-range phone, but the One A9 isn’t priced like a mid-range phone. Remember: you can buy a Galaxy S6 for less SIM-free in the UK and get similar deals on contract.

A9 17

The front-facing camera is better, though. It seems to work well in low light, so you can get a decent shot in most situations. It’s just a shame that the main camera is so hit and miss.

We test every mobile phone we review thoroughly. We use industry standard tests to compare features properly and we use the phone as our main device over the review period. We’ll always tell you what we find and we never, ever, accept money to review a product.

Find out more about how we test in our ethics policy.

Used as our main phone for the review period

Reviewed using respected industry benchmarks and real world testing

Always has a SIM card installed

Tested with phone calls, games and popular apps

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.