Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

EE Rook Review - Battery Life and Verdict Review

Sections

The battery on the EE Rook is only 1,500mAh. Still, that’s bigger than the Pixi 3’s 1,400mAh unit.

However, the small, low-res screen and weak processor mean that battery life doesn’t take a huge hit.

EE Rook 41

We used the phone for a week, with intermittent bouts of gaming, texting, browsing, watching videos, and calling. Under such standard usage, we found the device lasted about a day. You’ll need to charge it overnight however, as two days’ use simply isn’t possible with the Rook. Unless you’re leaving it in standby, of course.

It’s worth noting that unlike some of its budget rivals – the EE Harrier and Vodafone Smart Prime 6, for instance – the Rook’s battery is removable. As such, if you’re away from the mains for a few days, you have the option of packing a spare cell.

The speakers are tinny and lack detail, but that’s no surprise – this isn’t a Sonos system. However, it’s more than good enough for watching videos and listening to short audio clips.

You won’t want to listen to music on the Rook for any extended period of time, but this isn’t really what the handset is built for anyway.

When it comes to call quality, you’re benefitting from being on EE’s network. EE has some of the widest coverage in the UK, so reception is generally good – do check with the company first though, especially if you live out in the sticks.

We found no issue hearing the voice of incoming callers, and the speakers are plenty loud for hands-free calling too. Chatterboxes should bear that in mind that the phone becomes a little warm on long calls, however.

EE Rook 17Related: App Permissions: The Android 6.0 feature that really matters

EE isn’t trying to fool anyone with the Rook. This isn’t a device for smartphone buffs who want the latest and greatest from big-name brands. It’s for those with serious budget restrictions.

Good luck finding a 4G smartphone running Google’s latest operating system, with two cameras, a quad-core processor, and a removable battery that lasts about a day for less than £40 anywhere else.

It’s important to consider what else is on the market in this price range. At sub-£50, you’re generally looking at feature phones, which aren’t a patch on the EE Rook.

Perhaps the best alternative is the Alcatel OneTouch Pixi 3 at a slightly more expensive £49.99. It offers a bigger 4.5in screen but lacks a front-facing camera, so it’s here that you need to decide which is of most importance to you.

We should reiterate that the Rook’s viewing angles are particularly poor. As such, if you can afford to splash out a bit more, perhaps try the EE Harrier or the Vodafone Smart Prime 6. Nippier performance, more capable cameras, and better displays are also included. This phone is arguably too cheap.

If £40 is your maximum budget, however, then you won’t find better value than the Rook.

If you have only £40 in your “new phone” piggy bank, then you can’t go wrong with the Rook. But if you have a bit more cash to spare, shop around for pricier kit.

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Performance 9
  • Camera 6
  • Design 8
  • Battery Life 8
  • Usability 8
  • Value 10
  • Features 9
  • Software 9
  • Calls & Sound 8
  • Screen Quality 5

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.