Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Canon PowerShot G16 Review - Image Quality and Verdict Review

Sections

One of the hallmarks of Canon’s G-series to date has been the reliability of the cameras in terms of image quality, with the G15 continuing this tradition.

As the G16 features the same lens and sensor, albeit with an improved processor, it would be fair to assume a similar level of performance.

On the whole this rings true with the G16 delivering some of the very best images a compact camera can produce with very few, if any, major concerns.

Canon G16
1/250 sec @ f/8, ISO 400, AWB, Spot metering (Click to full res)

To begin with, the model’s metering system is as reliable as you would expect. The G16 handles almost any lighting scene – be it softly lit portrait or high-contrast daytime shooting – with ease, delivering even exposures in all conditions.

Furthermore, the G16 exhibits a dynamic range that’s certainly above average, while the camera’s automatic DR correction gives even more flexibility should the need arise.

Canon PowerShot G16
1/125 sec @ f/4, ISO 80, Custom white balance (Click for full res)

In extreme conditions you can opt for the HDR setting, although simply shooting Raw files should deliver enough exposure depth to satisfy your needs.

Auto white balance is similarly reliable, with the new multi-area white balance mode proving particularly impressive in mixed lighting conditions.

Canon PowerShot G16
1/400 sec @ f/4, ISO 1600, AWB, Spot metering (Click for full res)

Although the 12MP resolution might be lower than some competing compacts on paper, the way in which the G16 processes images, along with the sharpness of the lens, means that the camera resolves an impressive level of detail.

Canon PowerShot G16
1/40 sec @ f/2.8, ISO 400, AWB, Spot metering (Click for full res)

The only real area in which you could criticise the G16 is in terms of the way it handles noise at higher ISO settings in comparison to some of its peers. Although images are sharp and noise-free between ISO 80 and 800, between ISO 1600 and 6400 noise becomes more of an issue.

Although the G16 sports a high ISO 12,800 setting, by this point noise renders images almost unusable so should be best avoided.

Canon G16 review

There’s no escaping the fact that, at over £500, the Canon G16 is an expensive camera by any standards, let alone those of an advanced compact.

At that price the G16 will set you back more than some entry-level DSLR kits – such as the Pentax K-500 or Sony A58 – as well as some other impressive advanced compacts, including the Fujifilm X20 or Sony RX100.

With that in mind the Canon G16 does currently look a touch expensive. However, if you do decide to pick one up you’ll be doing so safe in the knowledge that it’s a fantastic camera that delivers on all fronts, and will certainly last you a good number of years.

While there’s no denying the Canon G16 is a pricey advanced compact, the combination of great build quality, stellar performance and fantastic image quality makes it one of the very best advanced compacts currently available.

Next, read our in-depth group test: the best cheap compact system cameras under £500

Trusted Score

rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star rating-star

Score in detail

  • Value 6
  • Design 9
  • Features 8
  • Image Quality 9
  • Performance 8

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.