Acer Predator 17 - Battery Life, Performance & Verdict

Score

Sections

Acer Predator 17 – Performance

Acer’s offering the Predator in three configurations in the UK, each of which will deliver varying performance. You can see the three options below:

  • Intel Core i7-7700HQ processor Quad-core 2.80 GHz, 16 GB, DDR4 SDRAM, 1 TB HDD, 256 GB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 with 6 GB Dedicated Memory (£1,799.99)
  • Intel Core i7-7700HQ processor Quad-core 2.80 GHz, 16 GB, DDR4 SDRAM, 1 TB HDD, 256 GB SSD NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 with 8 GB Dedicated Memory (£2,099.99)
  • Intel Core i7-7700HQ processor Quad-core 2.80 GHz, 16 GB, DDR4 SDRAM, 1 TB HDD, 256 GB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 with 8 GB Dedicated Memory (£2,599.99)

All these specifications put the 2017 Predator 17 well ahead of its predecessor, which used Nvidia’s 900-series mobile series of GPUs and a previous gen Intel CPU.

The GTX 1070 version I tested performed as expected during Trusted’s series of synthetic benchmarks, matching the scores of the near-equivalently kitted out HP Omen 17. You can see how the two gaming notebooks performed in the table below. The only notable difference was the Geekbench multi-core score, where the Predator’s seventh-gen CPU had a slight lead on the Omen’s sixth-gen.

Related: Best PC games

Gaming Notebook Geekbench single Geekbench multi 3DMark Fire Strike
Predator 17 4256 13,746 13,006
Omen 17 4086 11,512 13,064

 

Real-world performance was also solid, with the Predator being more than powerful enough to run AAA titles with their graphics maxed at 1080p.

Rise of the Tomb Raider’s benchmark ran at an average of 98.1 fps at 1080p with the graphics cranked. Ghost Recon Wildlands’ benchmark, with its graphics settings in ultra at 1080p, ran in at a perfectly playable 50 fps.

In short, if you only plan to play games at Full HD, then the GTX 1070 model is more than good enough. Given the lack of resolution upgrade options, I’d also only recommend upgrading to the GTX 1080 version if you plan to play games on a higher-resolution external monitor.

The only area in which the Predator struggles is SSD performance, where it recorded disappointing 522.2MB/s read- and 160.6MB/s write speeds in the CrystalDiskMark benchmark. This is lower than I’d like to see at this price, and is down to the fact that Acer has chosen a cheaper, SATA-based SSD rather than a proper NVMe PCIe model that could reach three times the speed with ease. They’re more expensive, but at this price I would have expected it.

Related: Best gaming laptops

Acer Predator 17 – Battery life

Gaming notebooks are usually portable in name only, and feature woefully short battery lives. The Predator 17 doesn’t change this, but it does perform fairly well by gaming laptop standards.

Running Trusted’s standard benchmark, which involves looping five minutes of video playback and 10 minutes of web browsing, with the screen set to 150 nits brightness, the Predator lasted an average of three-and-a-half hours before dying. Other notebooks in the Predator’s size bracket have often struggled to last more than two hours.

Gaming puts a bigger drain on the battery and I’m yet to get more than an hour-and-half’s playtime from the Predator off the mains, but once again, this is pretty par for the course on a gaming notebook.

Why buy the Acer Predator 17?

If you’re after a workhorse gaming notebook that won’t leave the house, the Predator 17 is – for the most part – a decent option. Featuring decent speakers, a multitude of GPU options, a G-Sync screen and a seventh-gen Intel Core i7 CPU, it’s more than good enough for AAA 1080p gaming.

Its only real shortcomings are its disappointing SSD, which offers sub-par performance, and its over-the-top-design, which will alienate less ostentatious buyers.

Verdict

Not perfect, but a solid all-round gaming laptop.

Score


Score in detail

  • Performance 9
  • Keyboard 8
  • Design 8
  • Screen Quality 8
  • Build Quality 9
  • Value 7
  • Touchpad 8
  • Heat & Noise 6
  • Battery Life 7