Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Favourites vs Likes: 5 Twitter problems that actually need fixing

Twitter’s just made a small change, ditching ‘Favourites’ for the Facebook-style ‘Likes’ signified by a heart – cue predictable complaints about Twitter turning into Facebook.

But this is a total distraction. While many people fret about how Twitter isn’t growing or isn’t as cool and fresh as it used to be, such complaints ignore some much bigger problems that plague the service.

Twitter is still a great platform and Likes probably make more sense than Favourites, but there are much bigger problems that Twitter needs to fix. Here’s my wishlist for the new CEO, Jack Dorsey

This is Twitter’s no.1 problem and it knows it. Former CEO Dick Costolo admitted as much before he left, but it doesn’t seem to have made any progress.

The horror stories about people who have been bullied off Twitter are numerous, but how many more people have quietly left after less high-profile incidents?

Not only is it bad for users; it means big stories about Twitter tend to be ‘bad news’ ones about trolls, hate crime and extremists.

I get fewer spam follows and tweets than I used to, but it’s clearly still a big problem. Express an interest in buying an iPhone, for example, and you’re pretty much guaranteed to get a bunch of spammy responses.

Again, if the first thing that happens when you start an account is get spammed, it isn’t an experience you’ll want to repeat.

Twitter lists are a good idea in principle, but Twitter has neglected the feature. Just try finding your Twitter lists in the mobile app and you’ll understand.

This is a problem because lists are the only way to organise and filter the people you follow. Unless you run a bunch of different accounts, it’s the only way to separate your personal friends from the mob, or get the latest from experts in a particular field.

The ‘noise’ on Twitter is often deafening and lists ought to be the answer, but they’re not right now. 

TweetDeck, the original Twitter client for power users, has gone through several painful periods over the years. Despite being owned by Twitter, it sometimes feels neglected and forgotten, which only alienates the power users who often produce the most interesting content on Twitter.

Some might argue a ‘proper’ desktop application – i.e. one that isn’t the web app in disguise – is what’s required, but that’s not it. I don’t care whether it’s a web app or not, but I do care whether it does what I want it to do.
A new mobile app would be nice, too.

One of the most cited turning points for Twitter has been the limiting of APIs that allowed developers to access the service and create apps for it. Doing so has all but killed the community of developers that drove much of Twitter’s early growth.

This has also lead to a lack of competition. Is it any wonder TweetDeck has declined when there are fewer good alternatives, many of which have been forced to charge high prices due to Twitter’s limits on access for third-party applications?

Finally, while Twitter has problems, the character limit must be preserved. It’s Twitter’s defining feature and one that forces people to think how to convey what they want quickly and simply. People will still find ways around it, but that’s half the fun.

Have you tired of Twitter, or do you still love it more than ever?  Let us know in the comments

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.