Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

YouTube bans dangerous pranks after Bird Box challenge idiocy

YouTube is banning videos that depict “dangerous challenges and pranks” in light of a series of viral clips showing people engaging in highly risky stunts.

The update to its guidelines comes after the latest craze, the Bird Box challenge, which has seen YouTubers post clips of them performing activities like driving a car, walking on a railway line and tattooing another person while blindfolded.

The viral hit was inspired by the Netflix film Bird Box, during which characters wear a blindfold to avoid being confronted by a manifestation of their worst fears.

However, this isn’t not the only dangerous viral prank to populate YouTube in recent times. The Tide Pod challenge saw participants eat poisonous laundry detergent pods, while the similarly counterproductive fire challenge saw teens set themselves ablaze.

Related: Netflix price hikes

In an update to its terms, YouTube said it welcomed many of the viral challenges that have become popular on YouTube, such as the bottle flip, but those with “perceived danger of serious physical harm” are no longer permitted.

The company wrote: “We’ve made it clear that our policies prohibiting harmful and dangerous content also extend to pranks with a perceived danger of serious physical injury.

“We don’t allow pranks that make victims believe they’re in serious physical danger – for example, a home invasion prank or a drive-by shooting prank. We also don’t allow pranks that cause children to experience severe emotional distress, meaning something so bad that it could leave the child traumatized for life.”

Channels featuring the pranks have two months to clean up their act, after that they’ll face censure from the platform.

Google added: “During this time challenges and pranks that violate Community Guidelines will be removed but the channel will not receive a strike. Additionally, content posted prior to these enforcement updates may be removed, but will not receive a strike.”

Is YouTube acting prudently here, or is the company overstepping boundaries by censoring this kind of content? Drop us a line @TrustedReviews on Twitter

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.