The US government is reportedly attempting to force Apple to crack up to a dozen more iPhones, according to a new report.
There’s been plenty of controversy of late with the FBI initiating a court order to have Apple provide back-door access to an iPhone linked with the San Bernardino shootings.
Apple, for its part, has pushed back on the grounds of customer privacy concerns, but the US government has insisted that this is a one-off case.
That latter argument seems to have been weakened by claims that there are up to a dozen more similar cases proceeding through the US courts. The Wall Street Journal reports that the US Justice Department is pursuing court orders to extract data from iPhones for a number of hitherto undisclosed cases around the country.
Prosecutors in these cases are apparently attempting to use the same 18th-century All Writs Act, as is being used to justify the San Bernardino case. However, none of the additional cases in question are linked to terrorism.
It’s also claimed that many of these other cases involve phones that run on older versions of Apple’s iOS platform, which are less problematic to crack.
Related: Apple vs the FBI: Your questions answered
These revelations, if proven accurate, are likely to strengthen Apple’s side of the argument in the short-term. The iPhone maker claims that the main San Bernardino case will set a dangerous precedent when it comes to forcibly bypassing its own encryption methods, and that it’s unlikely to be a one-off request.
Of course, as the report points out, prosecutors could also cite these additional cases as proof that current smartphone encryption is persistently getting in the way of serious criminal investigation work.
(apester:56c44ebdee2dfdd3604d2aa4)
Let us know what you think in the comments.
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.
Editorial independence
Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.
Professional conduct
We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.