Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Sniper Ghost Warrior 3 was “too ambitious,” says dev

Sniper Ghost Warrior 3 developer CI Games has opened up about the troubled development process of its flawed shooter.

Writing in a statement, CEO Marek Tyminski said the studio “spent too much effort trying to catch up with other AAA titles” such as Call of Duty and Battlefield.

It appears that CI Games underestimated the workload and size of its development team, leading to multiple delays and launch issues such as horrendous load times on PS4.

“We’ve learned a lot as a team over the course of development for Sniper Ghost Warrior 3, much of which I believe has shaped the talented individuals within CI Games and the entire studio for the better,” Tyminski said.

“When we began development of SGW3, we decided on such a relatively large scale of the game with its open world that now we realize it was just too ambitious versus what we could have been able to deliver in any reasonable amount of time.”

Related: SNES Mini – Everything we know

Simon Miller had some nice things to say about Sniper Ghost Warrior 3, although came away ultimately disappointed. Here’s a piece from his 4/10 review:

“Sniper: Ghost Warrior 3 offers some of the most satisfying sniping you can imagine, but everything outside of that just feels too drab and lacklustre to truly make it standout.”

It’s a shame to hear about the troubled creation of Ghost Warrior 3, although it certainly puts its sub-par quality and stream of delays into perspective.

“We’re planning to make a great tactical shooter where we can focus on exciting gameplay, some key mechanics, and missions that have depth without all of the trappings of a large open-world setting,” CI Games explained regarding plans for its next project.

Related: Assassin’s Creed Origins Preview

Have you played Sniper Ghost Warrior 3? Let us know in the comments.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.