Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Monster CEO talks Beats takeover: ‘We just want recognition’

With Apple having confirmed a $3 billion buyout of Beats, one company ruing its lost fortune is Monster, the audio specialist which helped develop the Beats brand.

Despite having brought Beats to life, providing much of the technology within Beats headphones and supplying considerable design, marketing and distribution support to the brand during its first five years of being, Monster stands to make nothing from the latest big-money takeover.

Having lost all connection to the Beats brand less than two years ago in a deal heavily skewed in Beats’ favour, Monster CEO Noel Lee is now after the recognition he believes his company deserves.

“We just want recognition as I don’t think that in the post-Beats era at Monster we have had enough,” Lee said speaking exclusively with TrustedReviews.

Although seemingly unconcerned by the lack of financial gain, Lee has admitted there is some level of disappointment at not being involved in the takeover, especially given how heavily Monster was involved in the development of the Beats brand.

Discussing his disconnect from the deal, Lee told us: “I would say that there was disappointment, obviously. If I could have participated more I could have got the Monster brand to participate more, but I don’t think that is the important thing for us.”

He added: “The important thing for us is to be recognised as the technology engine as we were Beats for the first five years. Beats has only been Beats for a year and a half. We essentially were Beats.”

Looking at how influential his company was in turning Beats into a brand ultimately worth $3 billion (£1.79bn), Lee stated: “We were involved in the distribution, the technology, most of the designs and the marketing and development of all these wonderful products which at the time were game changers.

“If I was to put a number on it, I would say we got 20 per cent of the recognition [we deserved]. 80 per cent of the public who are aware of Beats probably don’t know about Monster’s participation so I would love to get the remaining 80 per cent.”

While many would be furious at having pumped so much effort into a brand for relatively little financial gain, Lee appears to be looking at the positives.

“You could look at it as losing out on a large sum of money but Monster is not just headphones,” he said. “We were in business 30 years before we created the Beats products so we still have a company to run.

As far as, should we have gotten more, that’s not the point. This is just another milestone in the history of this company.

“We look at it as having had great success. Could we have asked for more percentage? Of course. Hindsight is 20-20 and had we known then what we know now, maybe I would have fought a little more for a higher percentage but we learned a lot and now we are on to our new phase of growth.”

A sign of the man’s continued ambition, asked what he would have done differently in Monster’s dealings with Beats, Lee didn’t seemed too bothered by lost percentages or million dollar deals.

Instead, pursuing missed recognition he told us: “At the time we were doing it, I guess we didn’t promote the Monster brand as hard as we promoted the Beats brand. In retrospect we would have done a better job of promoting the Monster brand.

“The recognition would obviously help [moving forward], especially positive recognition.”

Read More: Best Headphones

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.