large image

Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

“Inaccurate” Fitbit heart-rate data may be putting consumers at risk

Relying on Fitbit’s heart-rate monitoring technology could put users in harm’s way, according to a scientist at the centre of a lawsuit against the wearable firm.

Dr Edward Jo is investigating the accuracy of Fitbit’s PurePulse tech on behalf of a legal firm representing consumers in a class action lawsuit.

The assistant professor of Applied Physiology at California State Polytechnic University told Wareable that inaccuracies discovered by his study pose a danger to users of the Fitbit Charge HR, Fitbit Surge and Fitbit Blaze.

He said: “This inaccuracy that we’ve seen can definitely pose a danger not only to the clinical population, but those population of individuals who may not know that they have any cardiac-related conditions.

“It can definitely put them at risk.”

Related: Fitbit Blaze review

The independent validation study found that the accuracy of Fitbit’s tech is off by a whopping 20 beats per minute during “moderate to high-intensity exercise”.

Fitbit has contested the results of the study, which was based on 43 healthy adults, calling it a “baseless” test designed to “extract a payout”.

In a statement, the company wrote: “What the plaintiffs’ attorneys call a ‘study’ is biased, baseless, and nothing more than an attempt to extract a payout from Fitbit. It lacks scientific rigor and is the product of flawed methodology.

“It was paid for by plaintiffs’ lawyers who are suing Fitbit, and was conducted with a consumer-grade electrocardiogram – not a true clinical device, as implied by the plaintiffs’ lawyers. Furthermore, there is no evidence the device used in the purported ‘study’ was tested for accuracy.”

In response, Dr Jo claimed there was little incentive for he and his colleagues to damage their reputation by producing a flawed study.

Those suing the company over the PurePulse technology are seeking damages for “economic injury”.

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2004, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have 9 million users a month around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.