Trusted Reviews is supported by its audience. If you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a commission. Learn more.

Court overturns Google’s previous win in battle over using Oracle’s Java APIs in Android

Google had previously won in court over its use of some Java APIs within Android. The judge had ruled that it was within fair use for Google to build on the Java API because it was offered free.

But today a federal court overturned that decision, opening the way for Oracle to demand money from Google for the time it was using the APIs without permission. Google had used Java’s APIs because it wanted to make developing for Android as easy as possible. The move achieved this, and Android no doubt grew quickly as a result, and Oracle wanted money from the outset.

The original jury couldn’t decide if the use was fair or not, but that didn’t end up mattering because the judge tossed the case out anyway, claiming that it wasn’t possible to copyright an API. Today’s judgement suggests that the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals does not agree. The next step in the case will be for Oracle to take it to the Supreme court, which will probably take years.

This is something of a big deal in terms of precedent too, because APIs are widely used for one service to build on the core of another. APIs are crucial for helping with software development, and letting companies work with each other, without the need of complicated legal contracts to do so. And what’s more, it will also cause problems for applications that leverage services without an API, but via clever engineering. That could affect any number of apps you currently use and mean that only “official” apps will work with a service.

Read more: 8 Best Android Phones 2014

Via: Vox

Why trust our journalism?

Founded in 2003, Trusted Reviews exists to give our readers thorough, unbiased and independent advice on what to buy.

Today, we have millions of users a month from around the world, and assess more than 1,000 products a year.

author icon

Editorial independence

Editorial independence means being able to give an unbiased verdict about a product or company, with the avoidance of conflicts of interest. To ensure this is possible, every member of the editorial staff follows a clear code of conduct.

author icon

Professional conduct

We also expect our journalists to follow clear ethical standards in their work. Our staff members must strive for honesty and accuracy in everything they do. We follow the IPSO Editors’ code of practice to underpin these standards.